Clinical Practice Guidelines on Delirium - Consensus and Gaps: A Scoping Review Protocol

<ns3:p> Background Delirium is a fluctuating neuropsychiatric syndrome, with significant consequences including increased mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and long-term cognitive decline. Despite being a serious yet reversible syndrome, delirium is often poorly managed. Clinical practice guidelines providing evidence-based recommendations have become increasingly important for improving healthcare quality, consistency, and cost-effectiveness. The implementation of high-quality guidelines can play a crucial role in delivering good delirium care. Objective To identify national or major regional delirium clinical practice guidelines, relating to an adult population, appraise their development process, and identify areas of consensus/disagreement and gaps in their coverage of topics and recommendations. Methods Reporting will comply with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Systematic literature searches will be carried out in four academic databases (Medline Ovid, Embase, CINAHL EBSCO and PsycInfo EBSCO) and 19 grey literature sources comprising databases (TRIP, Google Scholar, Google), guideline repositories, delirium organisation websites and other sources. Two reviewers will independently perform title and abstract screening, then full text screening, against defined eligibility criteria. Data will be charted using standardised forms. Due to the nature of the scoping review, ethical approval is not required. This protocol was registered with Open Science Framework <ns3:ext-link xmlns:ns4="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" ns4:href="https://osf.io/kfh3m">https://osf.io/kfh3m</ns3:ext-link> . Discussion This scoping review will contribute data to a larger project aimed at developing an international clinical practice guideline for delirium. Results from this scoping review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at international conferences. </ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HRB Open Research
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14269.1
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Practice Guidelines on Delirium - Consensus and Gaps: A Scoping Review Protocol

Suzanne Timmons, Giuseppe Bellelli, Rowan Harwood, Alasdair M. J. MacLullich et al.
HRB Open Research
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Clinical Practice Guidelines on Delirium - Consensus and Gaps: A Scoping Review Protocol

Suzanne Timmons, Giuseppe Bellelli, Rowan Harwood, Alasdair M. J. MacLullich, Mary Faherty
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p> Background Delirium is a fluctuating neuropsychiatric syndrome, with significant consequences including increased mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and long-term cognitive decline. Despite being a serious yet reversible syndrome, delirium is often poorly managed. Clinical practice guidelines providing evidence-based recommendations have become increasingly important for improving healthcare quality, consistency, and cost-effectiveness. The implementation of high-quality guidelines can play a crucial role in delivering good delirium care. Objective To identify national or major regional delirium clinical practice guidelines, relating to an adult population, appraise their development process, and identify areas of consensus/disagreement and gaps in their coverage of topics and recommendations. Methods Reporting will comply with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Systematic literature searches will be carried out in four academic databases (Medline Ovid, Embase, CINAHL EBSCO and PsycInfo EBSCO) and 19 grey literature sources comprising databases (TRIP, Google Scholar, Google), guideline repositories, delirium organisation websites and other sources. Two reviewers will independently perform title and abstract screening, then full text screening, against defined eligibility criteria. Data will be charted using standardised forms. Due to the nature of the scoping review, ethical approval is not required. This protocol was registered with Open Science Framework <ns3:ext-link xmlns:ns4="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" ns4:href="https://osf.io/kfh3m">https://osf.io/kfh3m</ns3:ext-link> . Discussion This scoping review will contribute data to a larger project aimed at developing an international clinical practice guideline for delirium. Results from this scoping review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at international conferences. </ns3:p>

HRB Open ResearchVol. 8
University of Nottingham (GB), University College Cork (IE), Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.