Multi-criteria decision-making for optimal airfoil selection in small wind turbines at low Reynolds numbers

This research provides a data-driven methodology to choose optimal NACA airfoils suitable for small HAWTs operating at low Reynolds numbers. 36 airfoils at four different Reynolds numbers (421116–673866) were analyzed based on two important parameters: lift-to-drag ratio (Cl/Cd) and its standard deviation. Objective weighting was ensured before evaluation based on three multi-criteria decision-making methodologies: TOPSIS, AHP, and VIKOR. Borda Score was used to aggregate the rankings, and the consistency of the model was checked using Spearman’s correlation. NACA 4521, 4518, and 4421 emerged as high-performance candidates in all scenarios, with high aerodynamic performance and stability according to the results. The method developed in this research is a replicable method to choose the proper airfoil and will enhance the direction towards further optimization incorporating the structural and manufacturing aspects as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wind Engineering
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251395642
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-criteria decision-making for optimal airfoil selection in small wind turbines at low Reynolds numbers

Lhoussaine Tenghiri, Nissrine El Allami, Ilyass Bougaa
Wind Engineering
Wind Energy Research and Development
article

Multi-criteria decision-making for optimal airfoil selection in small wind turbines at low Reynolds numbers

Lhoussaine Tenghiri, Nissrine El Allami, Ilyass Bougaa
article en

Abstract

This research provides a data-driven methodology to choose optimal NACA airfoils suitable for small HAWTs operating at low Reynolds numbers. 36 airfoils at four different Reynolds numbers (421116–673866) were analyzed based on two important parameters: lift-to-drag ratio (Cl/Cd) and its standard deviation. Objective weighting was ensured before evaluation based on three multi-criteria decision-making methodologies: TOPSIS, AHP, and VIKOR. Borda Score was used to aggregate the rankings, and the consistency of the model was checked using Spearman’s correlation. NACA 4521, 4518, and 4421 emerged as high-performance candidates in all scenarios, with high aerodynamic performance and stability according to the results. The method developed in this research is a replicable method to choose the proper airfoil and will enhance the direction towards further optimization incorporating the structural and manufacturing aspects as well.

Wind Engineering
Al Akhawayn University (MA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Wind Energy Research and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi-criteria decision-making for optimal airfoil selection in small wind turbines at low Reynolds numbers — Lhoussaine Tenghiri, Nissrine El Allami, et al. · Wind Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS