Tackling the Challenges of Adding Pulse-level Support to a Heterogeneous HPCQC Software Stack

We study the problem of adding native pulse-level control to heterogeneous High Performance Computing-Quantum Computing (HPCQC) software stacks, using the Munich Quantum Software Stack (MQSS) as a case study. The goal is to expand the capabilities of HPCQC environments by offering the ability for low-level access and control, currently typically not foreseen for such hybrid systems. For this, we need to establish new interfaces that integrate such pulse-level control into the lower layers of the software stack, including the need for proper representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3731599.3767552
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tackling the Challenges of Adding Pulse-level Support to a Heterogeneous HPCQC Software Stack

Robert Wille, Eric Mansfield, Laura Schulz, Max Werninghaus et al.
2 citations
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
article

Tackling the Challenges of Adding Pulse-level Support to a Heterogeneous HPCQC Software Stack

Robert Wille, Eric Mansfield, Laura Schulz, Max Werninghaus, Lukas Burgholzer, M. Knudsen, Léo Van Damme, Albert Frisch, Alan A. Vetter, Amit Devra, Martin Schulz, Martín Letras, Muhammad Nufail Farooqi, Andreas Spörl, Jorge Echavarria, Nikolas Pomplun, Yannick Stade, Ercüment Kaya, H. Farooq Ahmed, Rakhim Davletkaliyev, Janne Mäntylä, Felix Rohde, Vladimir Kukushkin, Noora Färkkilä, Santana Lujan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We study the problem of adding native pulse-level control to heterogeneous High Performance Computing-Quantum Computing (HPCQC) software stacks, using the Munich Quantum Software Stack (MQSS) as a case study. The goal is to expand the capabilities of HPCQC environments by offering the ability for low-level access and control, currently typically not foreseen for such hybrid systems. For this, we need to establish new interfaces that integrate such pulse-level control into the lower layers of the software stack, including the need for proper representation.

Argonne National Laboratory (US), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), IQM (Germany) (DE), IQM (Finland) (FI), Max Planck Computing and Data Facility (DE), Alpine Quantum Technologies (Austria) (AT), Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (DE), Wala Heilmittel (Germany) (DE), Leibniz Supercomputing Centre (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.