Evaluating the Environmental Footprint of Steel-Based Bottle Closures: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

This research presents a detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of 26 mm Crown cork metal closures used in glass bottle packaging, with the objective of quantifying and comparing their environmental impacts across all life cycle stages. This study adheres to ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 standards and utilizes Microsoft Excel for structuring and documenting input–output data across each phase. The LCA encompasses three primary stages: raw material production (covering iron ore extraction and steel manufacturing), manufacturing processes (including metal sheet printing, forming, and packaging of closures), and the transport phase (distribution to bottling facilities). During the Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), steel production emerged as the most environmentally burdensome phase. It accounted for the highest emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and sulphur oxides (SOx), while emissions of heavy metals and volatile organic compounds were found to be negligible. The Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) was carried out using the Eco-Indicator 99 methodology, which organizes emissions into impact categories related to human health, ecosystem quality, and resource depletion. Final weighting revealed that steel production is the dominant contributor to overall environmental impact, followed by the manufacturing stage. In contrast, transportation exhibited the lowest relative impact. The interpretation phase confirmed these findings and emphasized steel production as the critical stage for environmental optimization. This study highlights the potential for substantial environmental improvements through the adoption of low-emission steel production technologies, particularly Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) processes that incorporate high percentages of recycled steel. Implementing such technologies could reduce CO2 emissions by up to 68%, positioning steel production as a strategic focus for sustainability initiatives within the packaging sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Analyses
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jeta3040035
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Environmental Footprint of Steel-Based Bottle Closures: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Eleni Didaskalou, Αλεξάνδρα Αλεξανδροπούλου, Dimitrios A. Géorgakèllos, Irini Spyrolari
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Analyses
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Evaluating the Environmental Footprint of Steel-Based Bottle Closures: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Eleni Didaskalou, Αλεξάνδρα Αλεξανδροπούλου, Dimitrios A. Géorgakèllos, Irini Spyrolari
article en

Abstract

This research presents a detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of 26 mm Crown cork metal closures used in glass bottle packaging, with the objective of quantifying and comparing their environmental impacts across all life cycle stages. This study adheres to ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 standards and utilizes Microsoft Excel for structuring and documenting input–output data across each phase. The LCA encompasses three primary stages: raw material production (covering iron ore extraction and steel manufacturing), manufacturing processes (including metal sheet printing, forming, and packaging of closures), and the transport phase (distribution to bottling facilities). During the Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), steel production emerged as the most environmentally burdensome phase. It accounted for the highest emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and sulphur oxides (SOx), while emissions of heavy metals and volatile organic compounds were found to be negligible. The Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) was carried out using the Eco-Indicator 99 methodology, which organizes emissions into impact categories related to human health, ecosystem quality, and resource depletion. Final weighting revealed that steel production is the dominant contributor to overall environmental impact, followed by the manufacturing stage. In contrast, transportation exhibited the lowest relative impact. The interpretation phase confirmed these findings and emphasized steel production as the critical stage for environmental optimization. This study highlights the potential for substantial environmental improvements through the adoption of low-emission steel production technologies, particularly Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) processes that incorporate high percentages of recycled steel. Implementing such technologies could reduce CO2 emissions by up to 68%, positioning steel production as a strategic focus for sustainability initiatives within the packaging sector.

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical AnalysesVol. 3(4)
University of Piraeus (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.