Reframing ‘Collapse’ Futures: Climate Breakdown, Resistance, and Pluriversal Transitions Beyond the Capitalist World-System

The claim that global capitalist civilisation is headed for ‘collapse’ has become increasingly common among scientists and sustainability researchers. This article will engage critically with the growing literature on global collapse futures by highlighting two problematic tendencies: (1) the tendency to think of ‘the future’ in singular terms; and (2) to use ‘collapse’ or ‘apocalypse’ as the master signifier through which these futures are understood, while obscuring potentials for resilience, resistance, and transformation. In contrast, I suggest decentring ‘collapse’ in analyses of these possible futures while bringing the potential for liberation and ‘pluriversal regeneration’ to the foreground. This does not mean rejecting the concept of collapse, nor does it mean downplaying the potential for widespread catastrophe. Rather, it means balancing this with recognition of the opportunities for political agency, creative world-building, and regenerating worlds and ways of life that have been violently dispossessed by capitalist modernity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Millennium Journal of International Studies
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298251380178
Primary Topic
World Systems and Global Transformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing ‘Collapse’ Futures: Climate Breakdown, Resistance, and Pluriversal Transitions Beyond the Capitalist World-System

Michael Albert
Millennium Journal of International Studies
World Systems and Global Transformations
article

Reframing ‘Collapse’ Futures: Climate Breakdown, Resistance, and Pluriversal Transitions Beyond the Capitalist World-System

Michael Albert
article en

Abstract

The claim that global capitalist civilisation is headed for ‘collapse’ has become increasingly common among scientists and sustainability researchers. This article will engage critically with the growing literature on global collapse futures by highlighting two problematic tendencies: (1) the tendency to think of ‘the future’ in singular terms; and (2) to use ‘collapse’ or ‘apocalypse’ as the master signifier through which these futures are understood, while obscuring potentials for resilience, resistance, and transformation. In contrast, I suggest decentring ‘collapse’ in analyses of these possible futures while bringing the potential for liberation and ‘pluriversal regeneration’ to the foreground. This does not mean rejecting the concept of collapse, nor does it mean downplaying the potential for widespread catastrophe. Rather, it means balancing this with recognition of the opportunities for political agency, creative world-building, and regenerating worlds and ways of life that have been violently dispossessed by capitalist modernity.

Millennium Journal of International StudiesVol. 54(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
World Systems and Global Transformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.