Association Between Intensity of Physical Activity in Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes in a Multi-Ethnic Population: Results from the PROMOTE Cohort Study

<b>Introduction</b>: The demographic shift amongst pregnant women, including older age and increasing obesity, has resulted in an increased risk of cardiometabolic complications during pregnancy, particularly gestational diabetes. This paper presents physical activity and gestational diabetes data in a multi-ethnic urban Australian population. <b>Methods and analysis</b>: The PROMOTE cohort study is an ongoing prospective pregnancy cohort study recruiting pregnant participants < 16 weeks gestation at a large urban public teaching hospital with high social and cultural diversity in Sydney, Australia. Participants are surveyed about their physical activity levels, dietary quality, emotional wellbeing and socio-demographic status using validated tools. Participants are consented for use of routinely collected clinical and social data, including medical conditions, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP) and glycaemia. Follow-up is from routinely collected data. <b>Results</b>: A total of 459 participants were recruited between February 2022 and February 2024. Physical activity levels at recruitment were sufficiently active, low active and inactive in 39%, 45% and 16% of participants. Participation in moderate or vigorous physical activity was reported in 19% and 16% of participants, respectively. Participation in vigorous physical activity occurred in 10% of those with GDM vs. 17% of those without GDM (<i>p</i> = 0.11). Participation in any moderate/vigorous physical activity was reported in 20% of those with GDM vs. 30% of those without GDM (<i>p</i> = 0.058). Compared to inactive behaviour, the unadjusted odds ratio of developing GDM amongst those participating in any moderate/vigorous physical activity was 0.58 (95% CI 0.33-0.97), <i>p</i> = 0.045. Participation in any moderate/vigorous physical activity showed an association with lower oral glucose tolerance test levels at 1 h (7.49 vs. 8.17 mmol/L, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Participation in any vigorous activity was associated with lower oral glucose tolerance test levels at 1 h (7.25 vs. 8.11, <i>p</i> = <0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Uptake of existing physical activity recommendations is low. Gestational diabetes risk showed a trend toward variation by intensity of physical activity, with a trend toward greater intensity being associated with a possible lower rate of gestational diabetes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223500
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between Intensity of Physical Activity in Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes in a Multi-Ethnic Population: Results from the PROMOTE Cohort Study

Mark McLean, Tim Usherwood, James Elhindi, Dharmintra Pasupathy et al.
Nutrients
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Association Between Intensity of Physical Activity in Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes in a Multi-Ethnic Population: Results from the PROMOTE Cohort Study

Mark McLean, Tim Usherwood, James Elhindi, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Amanda Samarawickrama, Yoon Ji Jina Rhou, Sarah J. Melov, N. Wah Cheung, Victoria M. Flood, Justin McNab, Ben J. Smith
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: The demographic shift amongst pregnant women, including older age and increasing obesity, has resulted in an increased risk of cardiometabolic complications during pregnancy, particularly gestational diabetes. This paper presents physical activity and gestational diabetes data in a multi-ethnic urban Australian population. <b>Methods and analysis</b>: The PROMOTE cohort study is an ongoing prospective pregnancy cohort study recruiting pregnant participants < 16 weeks gestation at a large urban public teaching hospital with high social and cultural diversity in Sydney, Australia. Participants are surveyed about their physical activity levels, dietary quality, emotional wellbeing and socio-demographic status using validated tools. Participants are consented for use of routinely collected clinical and social data, including medical conditions, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP) and glycaemia. Follow-up is from routinely collected data. <b>Results</b>: A total of 459 participants were recruited between February 2022 and February 2024. Physical activity levels at recruitment were sufficiently active, low active and inactive in 39%, 45% and 16% of participants. Participation in moderate or vigorous physical activity was reported in 19% and 16% of participants, respectively. Participation in vigorous physical activity occurred in 10% of those with GDM vs. 17% of those without GDM (<i>p</i> = 0.11). Participation in any moderate/vigorous physical activity was reported in 20% of those with GDM vs. 30% of those without GDM (<i>p</i> = 0.058). Compared to inactive behaviour, the unadjusted odds ratio of developing GDM amongst those participating in any moderate/vigorous physical activity was 0.58 (95% CI 0.33-0.97), <i>p</i> = 0.045. Participation in any moderate/vigorous physical activity showed an association with lower oral glucose tolerance test levels at 1 h (7.49 vs. 8.17 mmol/L, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Participation in any vigorous activity was associated with lower oral glucose tolerance test levels at 1 h (7.25 vs. 8.11, <i>p</i> = <0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: Uptake of existing physical activity recommendations is low. Gestational diabetes risk showed a trend toward variation by intensity of physical activity, with a trend toward greater intensity being associated with a possible lower rate of gestational diabetes.

NutrientsVol. 17(22)
The University of Sydney (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Westmead Institute (AU), Westmead Institute for Medical Research (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.