Comparative in vivo evaluation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a critical strategy for repairing large bone defects. This study aimed to assess the osteopromotive potential of a porcine cross-linked collagen membrane in critical calvaria-defects in rats. Seventy-two rats were divided into three groups: blood clot (CG - negative control), Bio-Gide® membrane (BG - positive control), and Ossix Plus® membrane (OSX - test). The defects were covered according to each group, and the experimental times were 7, 15, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. The collected samples were evaluated by histometric analysis, inflammatory profile, immunohistochemistry, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). At 7 days, no significant differences in bone neoformation were observed. At 15 days, the OSX group showed increased new bone formation compared to CG (p = 0.031). At 30 days, the BG group exhibited the most significant increase compared to both OSX (p < 0.001) and CG (p < 0.001). At 60 days, OSX demonstrated the highest osteopromotive potential, significantly outperforming CG (p < 0.001) and BG (p < 0.001). MicroCT analysis revealed that the OSX group had a bone volume (BV) of 17.33 ± 1.74 mm3, significantly higher than BG (8.06 ± 1.26 mm3, p < 0.05). The cross-linked collagen membrane was biologically more favorable for bone regeneration being a promising option for GBR procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brazilian Oral Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.110
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative in vivo evaluation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi, Rodrigo Neiva, Arthur Henrique Alécio Viotto, Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli et al.
Brazilian Oral Research
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Comparative in vivo evaluation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi, Rodrigo Neiva, Arthur Henrique Alécio Viotto, Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli, Ricardo Garcia Mureb Jacob, Izabela Fornazari Delamura, Leonardo Pérez Faverani, Ciro Borges Duailibe de Deus, Ana Maira Pereira Baggio
article en

Abstract

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a critical strategy for repairing large bone defects. This study aimed to assess the osteopromotive potential of a porcine cross-linked collagen membrane in critical calvaria-defects in rats. Seventy-two rats were divided into three groups: blood clot (CG - negative control), Bio-Gide® membrane (BG - positive control), and Ossix Plus® membrane (OSX - test). The defects were covered according to each group, and the experimental times were 7, 15, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. The collected samples were evaluated by histometric analysis, inflammatory profile, immunohistochemistry, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). At 7 days, no significant differences in bone neoformation were observed. At 15 days, the OSX group showed increased new bone formation compared to CG (p = 0.031). At 30 days, the BG group exhibited the most significant increase compared to both OSX (p < 0.001) and CG (p < 0.001). At 60 days, OSX demonstrated the highest osteopromotive potential, significantly outperforming CG (p < 0.001) and BG (p < 0.001). MicroCT analysis revealed that the OSX group had a bone volume (BV) of 17.33 ± 1.74 mm3, significantly higher than BG (8.06 ± 1.26 mm3, p < 0.05). The cross-linked collagen membrane was biologically more favorable for bone regeneration being a promising option for GBR procedures.

Brazilian Oral ResearchVol. 39
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.