A study of patient recall and comprehension of genetic testing results in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

<i>Objective:</i> Assess the accuracy of ALS patient recall of genetic testing results and evaluate comprehension of key implications of results. <i>Methods:</i> Participants were recruited from the Center for Disease Control's National ALS Registry. A survey collected participant demographics, their recollection of their genetic test result, and their understanding of the implications of their result. Comprehension was scored based on responses to key questions. Whenever possible, patient-reported test results were confirmed by review of their test report. <i>Results:</i> Most participants (n = 246) were white (n = 238, 96.7%) with high health literacy. Among participants whose self-reported result could be validated, most 93/98 (94.9%) accurately recalled whether they received a positive, negative, or uncertain result. Among participants who reported positive results, 32/50 (64.0%) demonstrated understanding that their genetic testing results explained their ALS, while 38/50 (76.0%) accurately characterized the risk that first degree relatives carried the same variant. Among participants who reported negative results, 100/142 (70.4%) incorrectly indicated that their result ruled out a genetic cause. When asked about the risk for family members to develop ALS, 98/142 (69.0%) correctly characterized this residual risk. However, only 12/142 (8.5%), answered both questions correctly. Overall, participants who saw a genetic counselor were more likely to demonstrate high comprehension (p = 0.022). <i>Conclusions:</i> The majority of participants demonstrated accurate recall of their ALS genetic testing result. However, deficits in understanding of key implications were identified, particularly among those with negative results. Participants who saw a genetic counselor had significantly better comprehension of their test results than those who did not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2582829
Primary Topic
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study of patient recall and comprehension of genetic testing results in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

Jewel Tomlinson, Victoria Klee, Jianing Ma, Jennifer Roggenbuck et al.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
article

A study of patient recall and comprehension of genetic testing results in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

Jewel Tomlinson, Victoria Klee, Jianing Ma, Jennifer Roggenbuck, Erik D. Roberson
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective:</i> Assess the accuracy of ALS patient recall of genetic testing results and evaluate comprehension of key implications of results. <i>Methods:</i> Participants were recruited from the Center for Disease Control's National ALS Registry. A survey collected participant demographics, their recollection of their genetic test result, and their understanding of the implications of their result. Comprehension was scored based on responses to key questions. Whenever possible, patient-reported test results were confirmed by review of their test report. <i>Results:</i> Most participants (n = 246) were white (n = 238, 96.7%) with high health literacy. Among participants whose self-reported result could be validated, most 93/98 (94.9%) accurately recalled whether they received a positive, negative, or uncertain result. Among participants who reported positive results, 32/50 (64.0%) demonstrated understanding that their genetic testing results explained their ALS, while 38/50 (76.0%) accurately characterized the risk that first degree relatives carried the same variant. Among participants who reported negative results, 100/142 (70.4%) incorrectly indicated that their result ruled out a genetic cause. When asked about the risk for family members to develop ALS, 98/142 (69.0%) correctly characterized this residual risk. However, only 12/142 (8.5%), answered both questions correctly. Overall, participants who saw a genetic counselor were more likely to demonstrate high comprehension (p = 0.022). <i>Conclusions:</i> The majority of participants demonstrated accurate recall of their ALS genetic testing result. However, deficits in understanding of key implications were identified, particularly among those with negative results. Participants who saw a genetic counselor had significantly better comprehension of their test results than those who did not.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.