Mechanisms of Proppant Pack Instability and Flowback During the Entire Production Process of Deep Coalbed Methane

Deep coalbed methane (DCBM) reservoirs often experience severe proppant flowback during large-scale hydraulic fracturing, which undermines fracture conductivity and limits long-term recovery. The critical flowback velocity (CFVP) is the key parameter controlling proppant pack instability and flowback. In this study, the instability and flowback behavior of proppant packs throughout the entire production process, from early water flowback to late gas-dominated stages, were systematically investigated. Proppant flowback under closure stress was simulated using a CFD–DEM approach to clarify the flowback process and mechanical mechanisms. Laboratory experiments on coal fracture surfaces under gas-liquid two-phase and gas-liquid-solid three-phase conditions were then conducted to quantify CFVP and its variation across different production stages. Finally, a semi-empirical CFVP predictive model was developed through dimensional analysis. Results show that proppant flowback proceeds through three distinct stages—no flowback, gradual flowback, and rapid flowback. Increasing fracture width reduces proppant pack stability and lowers CFVP but allows higher flow capacity, and within the typical gas and water production ranges of deep coalbed methane reservoirs, flowback is significantly reduced when the width exceeds about 8 mm. Closure stress enhances CFVP below 15 MPa but has little effect above this threshold, while higher stresses progressively stabilize the proppant pack and minimize flowback. Larger average proppant size raises CFVP and preserves conductivity, whereas higher gas–liquid ratios elevate CFVP and reduce flowback, with ratios above 40 sustaining consistently low flowback levels. These findings clarify the mechanisms and threshold conditions of proppant flowback, establish quantitative CFVP benchmarks, and deliver theoretical as well as experimental guidance for optimizing DCBM production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13113605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coal Properties and Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms of Proppant Pack Instability and Flowback During the Entire Production Process of Deep Coalbed Methane

Wenting Zeng, Xianlu Cai, Binwang Li, Tianhao Huang et al.
1 citations
Processes
Coal Properties and Utilization
1.15
article

Mechanisms of Proppant Pack Instability and Flowback During the Entire Production Process of Deep Coalbed Methane

Wenting Zeng, Xianlu Cai, Binwang Li, Tianhao Huang, Anna Dai, Peng Yan, Zhiming Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Deep coalbed methane (DCBM) reservoirs often experience severe proppant flowback during large-scale hydraulic fracturing, which undermines fracture conductivity and limits long-term recovery. The critical flowback velocity (CFVP) is the key parameter controlling proppant pack instability and flowback. In this study, the instability and flowback behavior of proppant packs throughout the entire production process, from early water flowback to late gas-dominated stages, were systematically investigated. Proppant flowback under closure stress was simulated using a CFD–DEM approach to clarify the flowback process and mechanical mechanisms. Laboratory experiments on coal fracture surfaces under gas-liquid two-phase and gas-liquid-solid three-phase conditions were then conducted to quantify CFVP and its variation across different production stages. Finally, a semi-empirical CFVP predictive model was developed through dimensional analysis. Results show that proppant flowback proceeds through three distinct stages—no flowback, gradual flowback, and rapid flowback. Increasing fracture width reduces proppant pack stability and lowers CFVP but allows higher flow capacity, and within the typical gas and water production ranges of deep coalbed methane reservoirs, flowback is significantly reduced when the width exceeds about 8 mm. Closure stress enhances CFVP below 15 MPa but has little effect above this threshold, while higher stresses progressively stabilize the proppant pack and minimize flowback. Larger average proppant size raises CFVP and preserves conductivity, whereas higher gas–liquid ratios elevate CFVP and reduce flowback, with ratios above 40 sustaining consistently low flowback levels. These findings clarify the mechanisms and threshold conditions of proppant flowback, establish quantitative CFVP benchmarks, and deliver theoretical as well as experimental guidance for optimizing DCBM production.

ProcessesVol. 13(11)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Coal Properties and Utilization
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.