ZERO-SUM VERSUS POSITIVE-SUM CONCEPTIONS OF WEALTH IN TRADITIONAL CHINA

<div><p>The idea that wealth is fixed in amount tended to predominate in traditional China. On one extreme were the Legalist philosophers, whose view of wealth conformed to their notion of zero-sum competition between public and private. On the other extreme were the Buddhists, whose beliefs included the concept of "one is many, many is one," facilitating wealth creation via "inexhaustible treasuries." Occupying the middle groundand ending up in possession of the fieldwere the Confucianists, who, while claiming to nurture the private sector under such banners as "storing wealth among the people," seemed the most open to the possibility that laissez-faire would best grow the economy. However, the Confucians were only favoring a distribution of wealth that favored the private sector, with the wealth to be distributed retaining in their eyes its finite character, incapable of multiplication.</p></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.16780
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ZERO-SUM VERSUS POSITIVE-SUM CONCEPTIONS OF WEALTH IN TRADITIONAL CHINA

Harry Miller
˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics
Chinese history and philosophy
article

ZERO-SUM VERSUS POSITIVE-SUM CONCEPTIONS OF WEALTH IN TRADITIONAL CHINA

Harry Miller
article en

Abstract

<div><p>The idea that wealth is fixed in amount tended to predominate in traditional China. On one extreme were the Legalist philosophers, whose view of wealth conformed to their notion of zero-sum competition between public and private. On the other extreme were the Buddhists, whose beliefs included the concept of "one is many, many is one," facilitating wealth creation via "inexhaustible treasuries." Occupying the middle groundand ending up in possession of the fieldwere the Confucianists, who, while claiming to nurture the private sector under such banners as "storing wealth among the people," seemed the most open to the possibility that laissez-faire would best grow the economy. However, the Confucians were only favoring a distribution of wealth that favored the private sector, with the wealth to be distributed retaining in their eyes its finite character, incapable of multiplication.</p></div>

˜The œJournal of Philosophical EconomicsVol. Volume XVIII(Articles)
University of South Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ZERO-SUM VERSUS POSITIVE-SUM CONCEPTIONS OF WEALTH IN TRADITIONAL CHINA — Harry Miller · ˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS