Preoperative Group and Save Tests in Elective and Emergency Cholecystectomies: An Economic and Environmental Burden

Background and objective Cholecystectomy is among the most frequently performed elective day-case surgeries in the UK, with a growing emphasis on same-day discharge. Although perioperative bleeding and the need for blood transfusion are uncommon with this procedure, routine group and save (G&S) testing is frequently performed for cholecystectomy, contributing to both a significant economic and environmental burden. This study aimed to assess the proportion of patients undergoing cholecystectomy who had preoperative G&S testing and to identify how many required a perioperative blood transfusion. Methods This study involved a retrospective analysis of 755 consecutive adult elective or emergency cholecystectomy procedures performed over a two-year period between August 2022 to 2024 in a North West England NHS trust. Patients were assessed from admission through to discharge. Data collected included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, surgical urgency, the number of preoperative G&S tests performed, and the incidence of perioperative red cell transfusion. Results Our cohort included 755 patients: 728 (96.4%) underwent total cholecystectomy, with 27 (3.6%) having associated cholecystectomy procedures. Seven hundred (92.7%) patients had an elective procedure, while 55 (7.3%) underwent an emergency cholecystectomy. The mean patient age was 49 years. Of the cohort, 159 patients (21%) were classified as ASA grade 1, 491 (65%) as ASA grade 2, and 105 (14%) as ASA grade 3. A total of 1,422 G&S samples were submitted for this cohort; 481 patients (64%) had two samples taken, while 92 patients (12%) had more than two G&S tests performed. Only one patient required a red cell transfusion, and two patients required a return to theatre due to anaemia secondary to haemorrhage. Conclusions Our findings suggest that routine preoperative G&S testing is not required in cholecystectomy, given the paucity of blood product transfusions. Unnecessary G&S testing costs our trust approximately £24,000 and consumes around 2,480 hours of laboratory time. This practice also imposes a considerable financial and environmental burden due to greenhouse gas emissions associated with the testing process. A more selective and stratified approach to G&S testing in cholecystectomy may prove beneficial in economic terms and work in synergy with the goal of improving sustainability in the NHS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96294
Primary Topic
Blood transfusion and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Group and Save Tests in Elective and Emergency Cholecystectomies: An Economic and Environmental Burden

M. Michele Moss, I. D. Farrell, Ahmed Haleem, Aiman Ibrahim et al.
Cureus
Blood transfusion and management
article

Preoperative Group and Save Tests in Elective and Emergency Cholecystectomies: An Economic and Environmental Burden

M. Michele Moss, I. D. Farrell, Ahmed Haleem, Aiman Ibrahim, Camille Kippen
article en

Abstract

Background and objective Cholecystectomy is among the most frequently performed elective day-case surgeries in the UK, with a growing emphasis on same-day discharge. Although perioperative bleeding and the need for blood transfusion are uncommon with this procedure, routine group and save (G&S) testing is frequently performed for cholecystectomy, contributing to both a significant economic and environmental burden. This study aimed to assess the proportion of patients undergoing cholecystectomy who had preoperative G&S testing and to identify how many required a perioperative blood transfusion. Methods This study involved a retrospective analysis of 755 consecutive adult elective or emergency cholecystectomy procedures performed over a two-year period between August 2022 to 2024 in a North West England NHS trust. Patients were assessed from admission through to discharge. Data collected included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, surgical urgency, the number of preoperative G&S tests performed, and the incidence of perioperative red cell transfusion. Results Our cohort included 755 patients: 728 (96.4%) underwent total cholecystectomy, with 27 (3.6%) having associated cholecystectomy procedures. Seven hundred (92.7%) patients had an elective procedure, while 55 (7.3%) underwent an emergency cholecystectomy. The mean patient age was 49 years. Of the cohort, 159 patients (21%) were classified as ASA grade 1, 491 (65%) as ASA grade 2, and 105 (14%) as ASA grade 3. A total of 1,422 G&S samples were submitted for this cohort; 481 patients (64%) had two samples taken, while 92 patients (12%) had more than two G&S tests performed. Only one patient required a red cell transfusion, and two patients required a return to theatre due to anaemia secondary to haemorrhage. Conclusions Our findings suggest that routine preoperative G&S testing is not required in cholecystectomy, given the paucity of blood product transfusions. Unnecessary G&S testing costs our trust approximately £24,000 and consumes around 2,480 hours of laboratory time. This practice also imposes a considerable financial and environmental burden due to greenhouse gas emissions associated with the testing process. A more selective and stratified approach to G&S testing in cholecystectomy may prove beneficial in economic terms and work in synergy with the goal of improving sustainability in the NHS.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Stepping Hill Hospital (GB), Royal Bolton Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Blood transfusion and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.