Health economics evaluation of screening for sarcopenia among community-dwelling older persons

Sarcopenia increased the risk of various adverse outcomes, including cardiovascular diseases, falls, and mortality. Implementing interventions could mitigate the harm caused by sarcopenia. With the dearth of health economics evaluation on sarcopenia screening, we aimed to evaluate the costs and benefits of sarcopenia screening strategies among community-dwelling older persons. We constructed a decision-analytic Markov model for a cohort of individuals aged 60 years and above with a total of 25 1-year cycles. A total of 20 screening strategies, with annual or biennial screening interval and 10 screening tools: SARC-F, MSRA-5, MSRA-7, calf circumference, Finger-ring test, Ishii test, SARC-CALF, AWGS 2019, SARC-F|MSRA-5 (Parallel test), and SARC-F|MSRA-7 (Parallel test), were assessed in our study. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by calculating the cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each strategy. The corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was obtained by comparing with no screening. Highly cost-effective strategies were considered if ICER was less than the per-capita GDP for China ($12,551.49), and the strategy with the lowest ICER was the most cost-effective. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA & PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the main outcomes. Compared with no screening, all screening strategies were highly cost-effective. The most cost-effective screening strategy was biennial SARC-F|MSRA-7 screening ($1461.52/QALY), followed by annual SARC-F|MSRA-7 screening ($2147.82/QALY), biennial AWGS 2019 screening ($2340.21/QALY), and annual AWGS 2019 screening ($2419.16/QALY). DSA results indicated that the model was relatively stable. PSA results indicated that the probability of annual AWGS 2019 screening being cost-effective increased to 100%, when the willing-to-pay threshold increased to $9800. Combining the PSA results, we recommended conducting annual sarcopenia screening with AWGS 2019 among community-dwelling older adults in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25263-x
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health economics evaluation of screening for sarcopenia among community-dwelling older persons

Boran Sun, Shu Wang, Yuan Wang, Jian Sun et al.
BMC Public Health
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Health economics evaluation of screening for sarcopenia among community-dwelling older persons

Boran Sun, Shu Wang, Yuan Wang, Jian Sun, Jingyue Wang, Wenli Lu, Yang Liu, Zhanliang Ruan
article en

Abstract

Sarcopenia increased the risk of various adverse outcomes, including cardiovascular diseases, falls, and mortality. Implementing interventions could mitigate the harm caused by sarcopenia. With the dearth of health economics evaluation on sarcopenia screening, we aimed to evaluate the costs and benefits of sarcopenia screening strategies among community-dwelling older persons. We constructed a decision-analytic Markov model for a cohort of individuals aged 60 years and above with a total of 25 1-year cycles. A total of 20 screening strategies, with annual or biennial screening interval and 10 screening tools: SARC-F, MSRA-5, MSRA-7, calf circumference, Finger-ring test, Ishii test, SARC-CALF, AWGS 2019, SARC-F|MSRA-5 (Parallel test), and SARC-F|MSRA-7 (Parallel test), were assessed in our study. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by calculating the cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each strategy. The corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was obtained by comparing with no screening. Highly cost-effective strategies were considered if ICER was less than the per-capita GDP for China ($12,551.49), and the strategy with the lowest ICER was the most cost-effective. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA & PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the main outcomes. Compared with no screening, all screening strategies were highly cost-effective. The most cost-effective screening strategy was biennial SARC-F|MSRA-7 screening ($1461.52/QALY), followed by annual SARC-F|MSRA-7 screening ($2147.82/QALY), biennial AWGS 2019 screening ($2340.21/QALY), and annual AWGS 2019 screening ($2419.16/QALY). DSA results indicated that the model was relatively stable. PSA results indicated that the probability of annual AWGS 2019 screening being cost-effective increased to 100%, when the willing-to-pay threshold increased to $9800. Combining the PSA results, we recommended conducting annual sarcopenia screening with AWGS 2019 among community-dwelling older adults in China.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN), First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.