Sex and Age Differences in Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric Cancer

<b>Background</b>: There is a lack of population-based and real-world data on sex and age differences in gastric cancer care. The aim of this study was to close this data gap and to analyze the sex and age differences in the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric adenocarcinoma. <b>Methods</b>: The analysis focused on patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinomas (ICD-10: C16.0-C16.9) documented in the cancer registry of the Federal State of Brandenburg from 2000 to 2020. The patient variables include sex, age at time of tumor diagnosis and the ECOG performance status. The tumor variables included location, grading, clinical TNM classification, clinical UICC stage and synchronous distant metastasis. <b>Results</b>: Of <i>n</i> = 8582 patients, 38% (<i>n</i> = 3263) were women. Compared with males, females had fewer adenocarcinomas located in the cardia (24.1% vs. 12.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), more signet ring cell carcinomas (13.2% vs. 22.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), more high-grade tumors (55.4% vs. 63.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a higher tumor cUICC stage (cUICC IV: 44.9% vs. 48.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). There was an interaction between sex and age modulating the differences between males and females. <b>Conclusions</b>: We were able to demonstrate several relevant prognostic differences in gastric cancer between men and women in terms of tumor location, stage, and metastases in a large patient cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14227894
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex and Age Differences in Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric Cancer

Ulrike Weber, Claus Schildberg, Ute Seeland, N.A. Dietrich et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Sex and Age Differences in Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric Cancer

Ulrike Weber, Claus Schildberg, Ute Seeland, N.A. Dietrich, René Mantke
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: There is a lack of population-based and real-world data on sex and age differences in gastric cancer care. The aim of this study was to close this data gap and to analyze the sex and age differences in the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric adenocarcinoma. <b>Methods</b>: The analysis focused on patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinomas (ICD-10: C16.0-C16.9) documented in the cancer registry of the Federal State of Brandenburg from 2000 to 2020. The patient variables include sex, age at time of tumor diagnosis and the ECOG performance status. The tumor variables included location, grading, clinical TNM classification, clinical UICC stage and synchronous distant metastasis. <b>Results</b>: Of <i>n</i> = 8582 patients, 38% (<i>n</i> = 3263) were women. Compared with males, females had fewer adenocarcinomas located in the cardia (24.1% vs. 12.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), more signet ring cell carcinomas (13.2% vs. 22.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), more high-grade tumors (55.4% vs. 63.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a higher tumor cUICC stage (cUICC IV: 44.9% vs. 48.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001). There was an interaction between sex and age modulating the differences between males and females. <b>Conclusions</b>: We were able to demonstrate several relevant prognostic differences in gastric cancer between men and women in terms of tumor location, stage, and metastases in a large patient cohort.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(22)
German Cancer Society (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE), Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.