Comparison of a Modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol With the Standard Protocol in Emergency Cesarean Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The study investigated the effectiveness of a modified enhanced recovery after surgery (mERAS) protocol in emergency cesarean deliveries (CDs), where its safety and applicability remain uncertain. Postoperative recovery was evaluated in pregnant women using the Thai version of the Quality of Recovery-35 (QoR-35) questionnaire and pain scores measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Methods: 50 pregnant women were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Medical Education Center of Phayao Hospital. The primary outcomes were the 24-hour QoR-35 score and the 48-hour VAS pain score. Additional parameters, including postoperative hospital stay, opioid use, and the onset of gastrointestinal function, were also assessed. Postoperative complications, such as fever, wound dehiscence, and readmission, were also evaluated. Results: The mERAS group showed a significant reduction in 48-hour postoperative VAS scores (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 5.0 ± 1.3; mean difference: 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14, 1.86, p = 0.024). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in assessments conducted immediately postoperatively or at 24 hours across all parameters. The mERAS group experienced shorter hospital stays (p = 0.017), earlier onset of burping (p = 0.049), and earlier onset of flatulence (p = 0.011). Neither group required additional opioid administration or experienced postoperative complications, such as fever, wound dehiscence, or readmission. Conclusions: Implementation of the mERAS protocol effectively reduced 48-hour postoperative VAS pain scores, shortened hospital stay, and improved patient outcomes without increasing morbidity or surgical complications in patients undergoing emergency CD. Clinical Trial Registration: The study has been registered on https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ (registration number: TCTR20250627001; registration link: https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/export/pdf/TCTR20250627001).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/ceog42810
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of a Modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol With the Standard Protocol in Emergency Cesarean Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Pornnapa Suriyachai, Pornpimon Nittiwatthanawit
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

Comparison of a Modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol With the Standard Protocol in Emergency Cesarean Deliveries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Pornnapa Suriyachai, Pornpimon Nittiwatthanawit
article en

Abstract

Background: The study investigated the effectiveness of a modified enhanced recovery after surgery (mERAS) protocol in emergency cesarean deliveries (CDs), where its safety and applicability remain uncertain. Postoperative recovery was evaluated in pregnant women using the Thai version of the Quality of Recovery-35 (QoR-35) questionnaire and pain scores measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Methods: 50 pregnant women were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Medical Education Center of Phayao Hospital. The primary outcomes were the 24-hour QoR-35 score and the 48-hour VAS pain score. Additional parameters, including postoperative hospital stay, opioid use, and the onset of gastrointestinal function, were also assessed. Postoperative complications, such as fever, wound dehiscence, and readmission, were also evaluated. Results: The mERAS group showed a significant reduction in 48-hour postoperative VAS scores (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 5.0 ± 1.3; mean difference: 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14, 1.86, p = 0.024). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in assessments conducted immediately postoperatively or at 24 hours across all parameters. The mERAS group experienced shorter hospital stays (p = 0.017), earlier onset of burping (p = 0.049), and earlier onset of flatulence (p = 0.011). Neither group required additional opioid administration or experienced postoperative complications, such as fever, wound dehiscence, or readmission. Conclusions: Implementation of the mERAS protocol effectively reduced 48-hour postoperative VAS pain scores, shortened hospital stay, and improved patient outcomes without increasing morbidity or surgical complications in patients undergoing emergency CD. Clinical Trial Registration: The study has been registered on https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ (registration number: TCTR20250627001; registration link: https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/export/pdf/TCTR20250627001).

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologyVol. 52(10)
University of Phayao (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.