Comparative Analysis of Progestin-Primed and Luteal-Phase Ovarian Stimulation Protocols in Patients With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization–Embryo Transfer

Background: Patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) face challenges such as inadequate follicular recruitment and decreased oocyte quality when subjected to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment. Methods: This retrospective self-controlled study included 130 patients with DOR who underwent IVF-ET using either the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) or luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPOS) protocol. In the PPOS protocol, ovarian stimulation was initiated in the early follicular phase with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) combined with gonadotropins. In the LPOS protocol, ovarian stimulation began in the luteal phase with letrozole and gonadotropins, followed by dydrogesterone. Final oocyte triggering, retrieval, and embryo culture were performed using standardized procedures. The primary outcomes included gonadotropin consumption, oocyte maturation and fertilization rates, as well as pregnancy-related outcomes. Results: Compared to the LPOS group, the PPOS protocol was associated with a significantly shorter duration of gonadotropin stimulation and a lower total gonadotropin dose (p < 0.05). The LPOS group did not have significantly higher metaphase II (MII) oocyte and normal fertilization rates (p > 0.05). The abnormal fertilization rate was numerically lower in the LPOS group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the LPOS protocol remained independently associated with a higher MII oocyte rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.91, p = 0.017), even after adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), and antral follicle count (AFC). No significant association was observed between stimulation protocol and clinical pregnancy after adjustment. Conclusion: Both PPOS and LPOS protocols effectively prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges and support the development of viable embryos in patients with DOR. Multivariate analysis further confirmed LPOS as an independent predictor of improved oocyte maturity, suggesting its potential utility in individualized stimulation strategies for this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/ceog43280
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Progestin-Primed and Luteal-Phase Ovarian Stimulation Protocols in Patients With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization–Embryo Transfer

Yilu Zou, Qicai Liu, Jielei Wu, Hangcheng Zhou et al.
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Ovarian function and disorders
article

Comparative Analysis of Progestin-Primed and Luteal-Phase Ovarian Stimulation Protocols in Patients With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization–Embryo Transfer

Yilu Zou, Qicai Liu, Jielei Wu, Hangcheng Zhou, Yu-Jia Guo, Mei Lian
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) face challenges such as inadequate follicular recruitment and decreased oocyte quality when subjected to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment. Methods: This retrospective self-controlled study included 130 patients with DOR who underwent IVF-ET using either the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) or luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPOS) protocol. In the PPOS protocol, ovarian stimulation was initiated in the early follicular phase with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) combined with gonadotropins. In the LPOS protocol, ovarian stimulation began in the luteal phase with letrozole and gonadotropins, followed by dydrogesterone. Final oocyte triggering, retrieval, and embryo culture were performed using standardized procedures. The primary outcomes included gonadotropin consumption, oocyte maturation and fertilization rates, as well as pregnancy-related outcomes. Results: Compared to the LPOS group, the PPOS protocol was associated with a significantly shorter duration of gonadotropin stimulation and a lower total gonadotropin dose (p < 0.05). The LPOS group did not have significantly higher metaphase II (MII) oocyte and normal fertilization rates (p > 0.05). The abnormal fertilization rate was numerically lower in the LPOS group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the LPOS protocol remained independently associated with a higher MII oocyte rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.91, p = 0.017), even after adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), and antral follicle count (AFC). No significant association was observed between stimulation protocol and clinical pregnancy after adjustment. Conclusion: Both PPOS and LPOS protocols effectively prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges and support the development of viable embryos in patients with DOR. Multivariate analysis further confirmed LPOS as an independent predictor of improved oocyte maturity, suggesting its potential utility in individualized stimulation strategies for this patient population.

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologyVol. 52(10)
Fujian Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN)
Fujian Medical University
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.