Where to aim with multispecies climate justice? A critical realist account

Climate justice has become a key concept in addressing normative challenges in climate change and related policies. However, most applications of the term have remained anthropocentric. The multispecies justice perspective seeks to remedy this anthropocentrism, through focusing on relationality between and among human and non-human actors in climate justice. We engage with three points where this perspective remains to be developed further: the scope of ‘subjects of justice’, the meaning of ‘justice’ and institutional applications of multispecies justice. We argue that the reliance in multispecies justice literature upon hybridist ontologies of nature and society hampers advancement in these three aspects. We, therefore, propose an alternative ontological foundation, based on critical realism, that can resolve these limitations in current approaches to multispecies justice, contributing to further development of the concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Politics
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2025.2582121
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where to aim with multispecies climate justice? A critical realist account

J. van Vugt, Adrienne de Ruiter, Christoph Henning
2 citations
Environmental Politics
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
2.21
article

Where to aim with multispecies climate justice? A critical realist account

J. van Vugt, Adrienne de Ruiter, Christoph Henning
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Climate justice has become a key concept in addressing normative challenges in climate change and related policies. However, most applications of the term have remained anthropocentric. The multispecies justice perspective seeks to remedy this anthropocentrism, through focusing on relationality between and among human and non-human actors in climate justice. We engage with three points where this perspective remains to be developed further: the scope of ‘subjects of justice’, the meaning of ‘justice’ and institutional applications of multispecies justice. We argue that the reliance in multispecies justice literature upon hybridist ontologies of nature and society hampers advancement in these three aspects. We, therefore, propose an alternative ontological foundation, based on critical realism, that can resolve these limitations in current approaches to multispecies justice, contributing to further development of the concept.

Environmental Politics
University of Humanistic Studies (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where to aim with multispecies climate justice? A critical realist account — J. van Vugt, Adrienne de Ruiter, et al. · Environmental Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS