Dynamic colour dynamics: markov decision processes for fashion inventory management
Abstract Efficient inventory management is essential for fashion retailers seeking to reduce waste, curb stock-outs, and protect margins. Because colour is a defining product attribute in apparel, balancing inventories across colour variants is both an economic and a sustainability challenge. We propose two complementary Markov-decision-process (MDP) tools to address this problem: (1) the Stochastic Risk‑Adjusted Markov Optimizer (SRAMO), a reinforcement‑learning procedure that samples prospective future states and rewards actions that minimize the expected deviation from a uniform colour distribution; and (2) Stochastic Risk Inventory Analysis (SRIA), a diagnostic test that flags colours whose steady-state probabilities differ significantly from the uniform benchmark, signaling latent over- or under-stock risk. Using a dataset of products and their recommendation‑link transitions from five global e‑commerce platforms, we built two transition matrices and benchmarked SRAMO against classical Q‑learning and a deep Q‑network (DQN). SRAMO reduced the average absolute deviation from uniformity to 0.042 ± 0.001, a 55% improvement over both baselines ( p = 0.003). Structural analyses show that anchor colours such as black centralize the MDP and mask substitution effects; removing black yields a more uniform steady state and elevates navy by 4.6%. These findings demonstrate that the SRAMO–SRIA framework can both optimize dynamic replenishment policies and provide interpretable diagnostics for attribute‑level inventory risk in volatile fashion markets.
Authors
- Michal Koren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2501-3361)
- Or Peretz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-5270)
Institutions
- Shenkar College of Engineering and Design (IL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Annals of Operations Research
- Published
- 2025-11-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-025-06915-y
- Primary Topic
- Color perception and design
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00