In Sync? Assessing Partners' Similarities in Comfort With Physical Affection–Sharing as a Predictor of Relationship Well‐Being

ABSTRACT Physical affection‐sharing (e.g., holding hands) is associated with better relational well‐being. But does similarity/dissimilarity in couple members' comfort with affection‐sharing also predict relationship well‐being? The current study utilized data collected from an online self‐report survey at both the individual ( n = 1832) and dyadic ( n = 86 couples) level, to assess whether partners' mean comfort with affection‐sharing, as well as their perceived/actual similarity, predicted relationship well‐being, and whether any associations varied by context (public vs. private) and/or relationship type (same‐sex vs. mixed‐sex). Considering these contextual variables may be important, as those in same‐sex relationships are less comfortable with public affection‐sharing due to ongoing stigma. Higher mean comfort with affection‐sharing was generally associated with better relationship well‐being, more strongly so in private than in public. Perceived dissimilarities in couple members' comfort with affection sharing were consistently associated with worse well‐being at the bivariate level. Results were less consistent when considering actual similarity/dissimilarity and when controlling for mean comfort levels. There were minor variations in the patterns for those in same‐sex and mixed‐sex relationships; overall, though, results were much more similar than different across relationship types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personal Relationships
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.70041
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Sync? Assessing Partners' Similarities in Comfort With Physical Affection–Sharing as a Predictor of Relationship Well‐Being

Karen L. Blair, Diane Holmberg, Sabrina Sgambati
Personal Relationships
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

In Sync? Assessing Partners' Similarities in Comfort With Physical Affection–Sharing as a Predictor of Relationship Well‐Being

Karen L. Blair, Diane Holmberg, Sabrina Sgambati
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Physical affection‐sharing (e.g., holding hands) is associated with better relational well‐being. But does similarity/dissimilarity in couple members' comfort with affection‐sharing also predict relationship well‐being? The current study utilized data collected from an online self‐report survey at both the individual ( n = 1832) and dyadic ( n = 86 couples) level, to assess whether partners' mean comfort with affection‐sharing, as well as their perceived/actual similarity, predicted relationship well‐being, and whether any associations varied by context (public vs. private) and/or relationship type (same‐sex vs. mixed‐sex). Considering these contextual variables may be important, as those in same‐sex relationships are less comfortable with public affection‐sharing due to ongoing stigma. Higher mean comfort with affection‐sharing was generally associated with better relationship well‐being, more strongly so in private than in public. Perceived dissimilarities in couple members' comfort with affection sharing were consistently associated with worse well‐being at the bivariate level. Results were less consistent when considering actual similarity/dissimilarity and when controlling for mean comfort levels. There were minor variations in the patterns for those in same‐sex and mixed‐sex relationships; overall, though, results were much more similar than different across relationship types.

Personal RelationshipsVol. 32(4)
Trent University (CA), Acadia University (CA)
Acadia University, St. Francis Xavier University, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.