Safe Crestal Sinus Elevation Below 3 mm Residual Bone with Tissue-Level Implant Placement: A Case Report

<b>Background and Clinical Significance</b>: Maxillary sinus augmentation is a well-established surgical procedure for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla when the residual alveolar bone height is insufficient. Traditionally, the lateral approach has been preferred in cases with less than 4 mm of bone; however, the crestal approach has emerged as a less invasive alternative, particularly with the advent of advanced techniques and tools such as hydraulic pressure systems and dedicated osteotomy kits. <b>Case Presentation:</b> This case report presents the clinical management of a 68-year-old female patient requiring rehabilitation of the right maxillary molars, where the residual bone height measured only 3.6 mm (in position 1.6) and 2.5 mm (in position 1.7). Using the CAS kit system with rounded drills and hydraulic pressure, a controlled crestal sinus elevation was performed, followed by simultaneous implant placement. Despite the extremely limited bone height, a final insertion torque of 30 Ncm was achieved for both implants, likely due to favorable sinus floor anatomy, under-preparation of the implant sites, and the use of tapered, macro-textured implants. Postoperative follow-up over three years showed stable bone levels and successful prosthetic rehabilitation with single crowns. <b>Conclusions:</b> This case report highlights the potential of the crestal approach in anatomically challenging scenarios. Proper planning, technique, and implant selection are mandatory to achieve predictable and long-lasting outcomes, even in cases previously considered contraindicated for this method. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this preliminary result.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8040228
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safe Crestal Sinus Elevation Below 3 mm Residual Bone with Tissue-Level Implant Placement: A Case Report

F Cecchetti, M Gargari, Marco Tallarico, Francesco Mattia Ceruso et al.
Reports — Medical Cases Images and Videos
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Safe Crestal Sinus Elevation Below 3 mm Residual Bone with Tissue-Level Implant Placement: A Case Report

F Cecchetti, M Gargari, Marco Tallarico, Francesco Mattia Ceruso, Carola Di Frischia, Edoardo Magnifico
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Clinical Significance</b>: Maxillary sinus augmentation is a well-established surgical procedure for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla when the residual alveolar bone height is insufficient. Traditionally, the lateral approach has been preferred in cases with less than 4 mm of bone; however, the crestal approach has emerged as a less invasive alternative, particularly with the advent of advanced techniques and tools such as hydraulic pressure systems and dedicated osteotomy kits. <b>Case Presentation:</b> This case report presents the clinical management of a 68-year-old female patient requiring rehabilitation of the right maxillary molars, where the residual bone height measured only 3.6 mm (in position 1.6) and 2.5 mm (in position 1.7). Using the CAS kit system with rounded drills and hydraulic pressure, a controlled crestal sinus elevation was performed, followed by simultaneous implant placement. Despite the extremely limited bone height, a final insertion torque of 30 Ncm was achieved for both implants, likely due to favorable sinus floor anatomy, under-preparation of the implant sites, and the use of tapered, macro-textured implants. Postoperative follow-up over three years showed stable bone levels and successful prosthetic rehabilitation with single crowns. <b>Conclusions:</b> This case report highlights the potential of the crestal approach in anatomically challenging scenarios. Proper planning, technique, and implant selection are mandatory to achieve predictable and long-lasting outcomes, even in cases previously considered contraindicated for this method. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this preliminary result.

Reports — Medical Cases Images and VideosVol. 8(4)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Sassari (IT), National Institute of Health (AM), Oldham Council (GB), Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.