Modeling Nigerian Crude Oil Prices: Comparative Evaluation of Linear, Volatility, and Deep Learning Approaches

The study focuses on determining the prediction performance of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models of Nigerian crude oil prices. The comparisons among traditional linear models, volatility-based models, and deep learning approaches were done using monthly data from January 1946 to June 2025. Based on the outcomes, the ARIMA (1,1,0) model produces a fairly good linear fit for the data. However, it has relatively high prediction errors, with an MSE equal to 590.87, RMSE equal to 24.31 and MAPE equal to 28.27%. The GARCH (1,1) models exhibit successful volatility clustering capturing, with the t-distribution variant outperforming the normal specification while still yielding higher prediction error than deep learning. The MSE for the LSTM model was 112.74 with a RMSE of 10.62 and a MAPE of 15.06% which closely followed the actual price movement. The LSTM model was the best model overall in predicting the Nigerian crude oil prices. This finding was evidence that markets characterised by volatility and nonlinear dynamics are best modeled using deep learning nonlinear approaches rather than the traditional econometric models.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov078
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Nigerian Crude Oil Prices: Comparative Evaluation of Linear, Volatility, and Deep Learning Approaches

Onyenze Kevin Ikeokwu, Godson Chioma Abugwu, Emmanuel Chigozie Umeh, Nwachukwu Adaku Chinyere
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Modeling Nigerian Crude Oil Prices: Comparative Evaluation of Linear, Volatility, and Deep Learning Approaches

Onyenze Kevin Ikeokwu, Godson Chioma Abugwu, Emmanuel Chigozie Umeh, Nwachukwu Adaku Chinyere
article en

Abstract

The study focuses on determining the prediction performance of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) and long short-term memory (LSTM) models of Nigerian crude oil prices. The comparisons among traditional linear models, volatility-based models, and deep learning approaches were done using monthly data from January 1946 to June 2025. Based on the outcomes, the ARIMA (1,1,0) model produces a fairly good linear fit for the data. However, it has relatively high prediction errors, with an MSE equal to 590.87, RMSE equal to 24.31 and MAPE equal to 28.27%. The GARCH (1,1) models exhibit successful volatility clustering capturing, with the t-distribution variant outperforming the normal specification while still yielding higher prediction error than deep learning. The MSE for the LSTM model was 112.74 with a RMSE of 10.62 and a MAPE of 15.06% which closely followed the actual price movement. The LSTM model was the best model overall in predicting the Nigerian crude oil prices. This finding was evidence that markets characterised by volatility and nonlinear dynamics are best modeled using deep learning nonlinear approaches rather than the traditional econometric models.

Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.