What is a drought-to-flood transition? Pitfalls and recommendations for defining consecutive hydrological extreme events

Abstract. Research into rapid transitions between hydrological drought and flood is growing in popularity, in part due to media-reported catastrophic impacts from recent events. Droughts and floods are typically studied as events that are independent from one another. Thus, a clear definition and assessment of the methods used to define consecutive drought-to-flood transition events does not yet exist. Here, we use a series of eight catchments that have experienced real-world impacts from drought-to-flood transitions as case studies. We assess the suitability of and differences between event selection methods applied to observational data. We demonstrate that different threshold level methods can alter the characteristics of selected events. The number and timing of transitions differs substantially between threshold level approaches in highly seasonal regimes as opposed to those with a weaker seasonality. The time period used to define the maximum interval between drought and flood also influences whether transitions are detected. We show that the probability of a transition occurring within a set time window could vary substantially between different methodologies and catchments. We also show that previously applied methodologies would likely fail to detect transition events that have been broadly impactful in the historical record. For the eight case study events taken from media, governmental and scientific reports, only three of the transitions were successfully detected. We qualitatively assessed the streamflow time series of the case study catchments, and outline a number of potential pitfalls in the event detection process. Finally, we make recommendations regarding methodological choices in the context of potential impacts of interest, and outline some priorities for future methodological development and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6069-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is a drought-to-flood transition? Pitfalls and recommendations for defining consecutive hydrological extreme events

Manuela I. Brunner, Eduardo Muñoz‐Castro, Lena M. Tallaksen, Alessia Matanó et al.
1 citations
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
1.11
article

What is a drought-to-flood transition? Pitfalls and recommendations for defining consecutive hydrological extreme events

Manuela I. Brunner, Eduardo Muñoz‐Castro, Lena M. Tallaksen, Alessia Matanó, Eugene Magee, Bailey Anderson, Jonas Götte, Rachael Armitage
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Research into rapid transitions between hydrological drought and flood is growing in popularity, in part due to media-reported catastrophic impacts from recent events. Droughts and floods are typically studied as events that are independent from one another. Thus, a clear definition and assessment of the methods used to define consecutive drought-to-flood transition events does not yet exist. Here, we use a series of eight catchments that have experienced real-world impacts from drought-to-flood transitions as case studies. We assess the suitability of and differences between event selection methods applied to observational data. We demonstrate that different threshold level methods can alter the characteristics of selected events. The number and timing of transitions differs substantially between threshold level approaches in highly seasonal regimes as opposed to those with a weaker seasonality. The time period used to define the maximum interval between drought and flood also influences whether transitions are detected. We show that the probability of a transition occurring within a set time window could vary substantially between different methodologies and catchments. We also show that previously applied methodologies would likely fail to detect transition events that have been broadly impactful in the historical record. For the eight case study events taken from media, governmental and scientific reports, only three of the transitions were successfully detected. We qualitatively assessed the streamflow time series of the case study catchments, and outline a number of potential pitfalls in the event detection process. Finally, we make recommendations regarding methodological choices in the context of potential impacts of interest, and outline some priorities for future methodological development and research.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 29(21)
University of Oslo (NO), ETH Zurich (CH), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos (CH), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.