The interplay between perceived stress, psychological flexibility, and interpretation biases in undergraduate mental health

Stress is a well-established risk factor for psychological burden, yet individual vulnerability varies, suggesting that stress intensity and cognitive-psychological factors might be implicated in this process. This study examined how perceived stress at two different phases (moderate vs. high stress) relates to psychological symptoms and positive mental health through lower levels of psychological flexibility and whether interpretation biases in response to social ambiguity moderate this effect. A total of 228 healthy undergraduate students were assessed once at the beginning of a semester (T0: moderate stress phase) and 12 weeks later during exams (T1: high stress phase). Psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between stress and both psychological symptoms and positive mental health at both time points. Notably, baseline negative interpretation biases moderated this mediation effect for depressive symptoms at T1 (high stress phase), such that lower psychological flexibility was linked to higher depression levels only among individuals with moderate to high levels of negative interpretation bias. In turn, the absence of negative biases buffered against these effects. No such moderation effects were observed under moderate stress (T0) or for positive interpretation biases at either time point. These findings highlight the importance of interventions that combine techniques to foster psychological flexibility and reduce negative interpretation biases, particularly for individuals under high stress or vulnerable to depression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26492-1
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interplay between perceived stress, psychological flexibility, and interpretation biases in undergraduate mental health

Tim Klucken, Alla Machulska
Scientific Reports
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

The interplay between perceived stress, psychological flexibility, and interpretation biases in undergraduate mental health

Tim Klucken, Alla Machulska
article en

Abstract

Stress is a well-established risk factor for psychological burden, yet individual vulnerability varies, suggesting that stress intensity and cognitive-psychological factors might be implicated in this process. This study examined how perceived stress at two different phases (moderate vs. high stress) relates to psychological symptoms and positive mental health through lower levels of psychological flexibility and whether interpretation biases in response to social ambiguity moderate this effect. A total of 228 healthy undergraduate students were assessed once at the beginning of a semester (T0: moderate stress phase) and 12 weeks later during exams (T1: high stress phase). Psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between stress and both psychological symptoms and positive mental health at both time points. Notably, baseline negative interpretation biases moderated this mediation effect for depressive symptoms at T1 (high stress phase), such that lower psychological flexibility was linked to higher depression levels only among individuals with moderate to high levels of negative interpretation bias. In turn, the absence of negative biases buffered against these effects. No such moderation effects were observed under moderate stress (T0) or for positive interpretation biases at either time point. These findings highlight the importance of interventions that combine techniques to foster psychological flexibility and reduce negative interpretation biases, particularly for individuals under high stress or vulnerable to depression.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Siegen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.