Emergence of Electroanalytical Techniques for Arsenic Detection in Water: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives

Arsenic contamination in drinking water remains a critical global health concern, with inorganic arsenic species like arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) posing severe toxicity risks, including carcinogenic and systemic health effects. Recognized as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, arsenic necessitates stringent monitoring to comply with the World Health Organization's (WHO) permissible limit of 10 ppb. Traditional analytical methods such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (ICP‐MS) provide high precision but are constrained by high costs, operational complexity, and lack of portability, thereby limiting their accessibility in resource‐constrained and out‐of‐laboratory settings. Previous work by the authors explored the methods of arsenic detection and determination by covering most of the analytical methods and techniques, including various sensors and biosensor advancements. This review delves into the progress made predominantly over the last two decades in electroanalytical detection methodologies, which have gained momentum due to their rapid response time, high sensitivity, and adaptability for portable and cost‐effective sensing platforms. Unlike most of the material‐focused articles, this review presents recent advances in arsenic detection using various electroanalytical techniques—stripping voltammetry, pulse voltammetry, sweep voltammetry, combined voltammetry approaches, amperometry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The review covers necessary fundamentals of electroanalytical techniques, recent advancements, and emerging trends in arsenic sensor development. The review further explores the portable and onsite electrochemical arsenic sensors, followed by the main challenges and future outlook in this space. The integration of nanomaterials, screen‐printed electrodes, and microfluidic devices has significantly improved the detection capabilities. However, standardization, reliability, scalability, speciation, and seamless data integration remain pressing challenges. Smartphone‐integrated electrochemical sensors and AI‐driven data analytics have the capabilities to foster real‐time and onsite arsenic detection with enhanced performance. By leveraging sustainable materials innovations, miniaturized electrochemical platforms, and smart data handling approaches, next‐generation arsenic sensors hold promise for ensuring safe drinking water in vulnerable and remote communities worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemElectroChem
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202500259
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergence of Electroanalytical Techniques for Arsenic Detection in Water: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives

Christine O’Connor, Abhijnan Bhat, Furong Tian, A. K. Gupta et al.
1 citations
ChemElectroChem
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
0.86
article

Emergence of Electroanalytical Techniques for Arsenic Detection in Water: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives

Christine O’Connor, Abhijnan Bhat, Furong Tian, A. K. Gupta, Baljit Singh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Arsenic contamination in drinking water remains a critical global health concern, with inorganic arsenic species like arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) posing severe toxicity risks, including carcinogenic and systemic health effects. Recognized as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, arsenic necessitates stringent monitoring to comply with the World Health Organization's (WHO) permissible limit of 10 ppb. Traditional analytical methods such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (ICP‐MS) provide high precision but are constrained by high costs, operational complexity, and lack of portability, thereby limiting their accessibility in resource‐constrained and out‐of‐laboratory settings. Previous work by the authors explored the methods of arsenic detection and determination by covering most of the analytical methods and techniques, including various sensors and biosensor advancements. This review delves into the progress made predominantly over the last two decades in electroanalytical detection methodologies, which have gained momentum due to their rapid response time, high sensitivity, and adaptability for portable and cost‐effective sensing platforms. Unlike most of the material‐focused articles, this review presents recent advances in arsenic detection using various electroanalytical techniques—stripping voltammetry, pulse voltammetry, sweep voltammetry, combined voltammetry approaches, amperometry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The review covers necessary fundamentals of electroanalytical techniques, recent advancements, and emerging trends in arsenic sensor development. The review further explores the portable and onsite electrochemical arsenic sensors, followed by the main challenges and future outlook in this space. The integration of nanomaterials, screen‐printed electrodes, and microfluidic devices has significantly improved the detection capabilities. However, standardization, reliability, scalability, speciation, and seamless data integration remain pressing challenges. Smartphone‐integrated electrochemical sensors and AI‐driven data analytics have the capabilities to foster real‐time and onsite arsenic detection with enhanced performance. By leveraging sustainable materials innovations, miniaturized electrochemical platforms, and smart data handling approaches, next‐generation arsenic sensors hold promise for ensuring safe drinking water in vulnerable and remote communities worldwide.

ChemElectroChemVol. 12(23)
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Technological University Dublin (IE)
Technological University Dublin
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.