Face-work in East Asia’s Diplomatic Culture

Abstract This article examines the role of “face” in East Asian diplomacy and argues that attention to it provides crucial insights into how regional states manage status, hierarchy, and mutual recognition. Drawing on Erving Goffman’s concept of face-work and adapting it to the international level, the paper analyzes how East Asian diplomats navigate the challenge of preserving national dignity while avoiding loss of face in their regular diplomatic interactions. It identifies three forms of face-work—affirming equality, negotiating contested status, and enacting hierarchy—and shows how each contributes to either stabilizing or destabilizing inter-state relations. Through case studies involving ASEAN, Indonesia–Malaysia relations, Sino-Japanese relations, and China–Southeast Asia dynamics, the article demonstrates that face-work is both a mechanism of relational maintenance and a tool of status assertion. It further highlights the conditions under which face becomes especially conflict-prone: status incongruence, symbolic stakes, and high public visibility. While grounded in East Asia, the article concludes by reflecting on the broader significance of face dynamics for global diplomacy in an era of rising powers and contested international order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
East Asia
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-025-09467-x
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Face-work in East Asia’s Diplomatic Culture

Antoine Roth
East Asia
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Face-work in East Asia’s Diplomatic Culture

Antoine Roth
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the role of “face” in East Asian diplomacy and argues that attention to it provides crucial insights into how regional states manage status, hierarchy, and mutual recognition. Drawing on Erving Goffman’s concept of face-work and adapting it to the international level, the paper analyzes how East Asian diplomats navigate the challenge of preserving national dignity while avoiding loss of face in their regular diplomatic interactions. It identifies three forms of face-work—affirming equality, negotiating contested status, and enacting hierarchy—and shows how each contributes to either stabilizing or destabilizing inter-state relations. Through case studies involving ASEAN, Indonesia–Malaysia relations, Sino-Japanese relations, and China–Southeast Asia dynamics, the article demonstrates that face-work is both a mechanism of relational maintenance and a tool of status assertion. It further highlights the conditions under which face becomes especially conflict-prone: status incongruence, symbolic stakes, and high public visibility. While grounded in East Asia, the article concludes by reflecting on the broader significance of face dynamics for global diplomacy in an era of rising powers and contested international order.

East Asia
Tohoku University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.