Counter‐Cyclical Defaults in Costly State Verification Models

ABSTRACT This paper shows that a pro‐cyclical risk‐free rate can solve the problem of pro‐cyclical defaults in costly state verification models. The paper computes numerically the coefficient of a Taylor rule that delivers pro‐cyclical output, pro‐cyclical capital and counter‐cyclical defaults. This parametrization is consistent with the empirical evidence on Taylor rules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manchester School
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.70015
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counter‐Cyclical Defaults in Costly State Verification Models

Michele Piffer
Manchester School
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
article

Counter‐Cyclical Defaults in Costly State Verification Models

Michele Piffer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper shows that a pro‐cyclical risk‐free rate can solve the problem of pro‐cyclical defaults in costly state verification models. The paper computes numerically the coefficient of a Taylor rule that delivers pro‐cyclical output, pro‐cyclical capital and counter‐cyclical defaults. This parametrization is consistent with the empirical evidence on Taylor rules.

Manchester SchoolVol. 94(2)
King's College London (GB), London South Bank University (GB), Bank of England (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.