Impact of Sample Type on ADAP-Based Autoantibody Detection for Type 1 Diabetes Population Screening

<b><i>Context:</i></b> The growing worldwide interest in early-stage type 1 diabetes (T1D) screening highlights the need for efficient and affordable approaches. Advanced analytical technologies such as Antibody Detection by Agglutination-PCR (ADAP) have improved large-scale sample handling, but optimal sample selection for simplified collection and processing remains a major challenge in screening designs. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess ADAP for T1D-related autoantibody detection in different blood-derived samples to select the optimal sample type for large-scale screening. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Autoantibodies against insulin (IAA), glutamate decarboxylase (GADA), protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 (IA2A), and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A) were analyzed by ADAP in 171 patients with stage 3 T1D (13.7 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 6.5-15.0) and 95 healthy controls (41.9 years; IQR: 29.5-56.7) previously studied by radiobinding assay (RBA). Comparison of sensitivity/specificity of ADAP and RBA in serum was assessed, as well as ADAP concordance across serum, plasma, EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood, and dried blood spot (DBS). Whole-blood stability was also investigated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> ADAP-based detection of two or more autoantibodies in serum demonstrated high sensitivity (87.1%) and specificity (100%), with strong concordance with RBA (Cohen's kappa 0.90). Autoantibody analysis in whole blood by ADAP showed high agreement with serum, making it a consistent alternative. In contrast, DBS sampling had reduced concordance, which led to fewer positive detections and suggests a potential bias for T1D screening. A remarkable advantage was that autoantibodies in unrefrigerated whole blood remained stable for up to 7 days (IAA) and 20 days (GADA, IA2A, and ZnT8A), and also after four freeze-thaw cycles, considerably simplifying logistics. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Pancreatic autoantibody detection in whole blood with ADAP provides a stable and more efficient diagnostic solution for T1D population screening, with simplified preparation, low-volume requirements, and high diagnostic consistency comparable with serum-based assays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251390835
Primary Topic
Diabetes and associated disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Sample Type on ADAP-Based Autoantibody Detection for Type 1 Diabetes Population Screening

Virginia Urquijo, Rosa Martı́nez, Luís Castaño, Maitane González-Arceo et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diabetes and associated disorders
article

Impact of Sample Type on ADAP-Based Autoantibody Detection for Type 1 Diabetes Population Screening

Virginia Urquijo, Rosa Martı́nez, Luís Castaño, Maitane González-Arceo, Itxaso Rica, Inés Urrutia, Begoña Calvo, José Ramón Bilbao, Elsa Fernández-Rubio, Josu Aurrekoetxea-Oribe
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Context:</i></b> The growing worldwide interest in early-stage type 1 diabetes (T1D) screening highlights the need for efficient and affordable approaches. Advanced analytical technologies such as Antibody Detection by Agglutination-PCR (ADAP) have improved large-scale sample handling, but optimal sample selection for simplified collection and processing remains a major challenge in screening designs. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To assess ADAP for T1D-related autoantibody detection in different blood-derived samples to select the optimal sample type for large-scale screening. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Autoantibodies against insulin (IAA), glutamate decarboxylase (GADA), protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 (IA2A), and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A) were analyzed by ADAP in 171 patients with stage 3 T1D (13.7 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 6.5-15.0) and 95 healthy controls (41.9 years; IQR: 29.5-56.7) previously studied by radiobinding assay (RBA). Comparison of sensitivity/specificity of ADAP and RBA in serum was assessed, as well as ADAP concordance across serum, plasma, EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood, and dried blood spot (DBS). Whole-blood stability was also investigated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> ADAP-based detection of two or more autoantibodies in serum demonstrated high sensitivity (87.1%) and specificity (100%), with strong concordance with RBA (Cohen's kappa 0.90). Autoantibody analysis in whole blood by ADAP showed high agreement with serum, making it a consistent alternative. In contrast, DBS sampling had reduced concordance, which led to fewer positive detections and suggests a potential bias for T1D screening. A remarkable advantage was that autoantibodies in unrefrigerated whole blood remained stable for up to 7 days (IAA) and 20 days (GADA, IA2A, and ZnT8A), and also after four freeze-thaw cycles, considerably simplifying logistics. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Pancreatic autoantibody detection in whole blood with ADAP provides a stable and more efficient diagnostic solution for T1D population screening, with simplified preparation, low-volume requirements, and high diagnostic consistency comparable with serum-based assays.

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
BioCruces Health research Institute (ES), Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (ES), Hospital de Cruces (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Diabetes and associated disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.