Red deer adult sex ratio: comparing three approaches using camera trap data

Abstract European forests face severe challenges due to climate change, highlighting the importance of tree species diversity for regeneration. The management of browsing species such as red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) is therefore crucial. An important metric for managing population size is the adult sex ratio (ASR), for example, derived from camera trap data. In our study, we address 2 issues specific to camera trap methods separately: avoiding the loss of information contained in the proportion of unknown‐sex sightings and accounting for sex‐specific detection probabilities. Our hypothesis was that these advanced statistical methods reveal a potential bias in the estimation of red deer ASR in a naive approach directly from raw camera trap data. We conducted research in an alpine area of Austria from January 2020 to May 2022. We chose weeks 9 to 17 in spring to obtain pre‐hunting and pre‐birth data. We included unknown‐sex sightings (8.9% of all sightings) with predicted sex (precision of 75%) in the ASR estimation after conducting a model selection process with the goal of the highest precision in prediction. These predicted ASRs showed a non‐significant slight shift towards males, indicating a more balanced ASR than a naive ASR. To include sex‐specific detection probabilities, we ran a Royle Nichols occupancy model for both sexes and calculated ASR from estimated latent abundances. Contrary to our expectations, there were no significant differences between the occupancy‐based ASRs and the naive or predicted ASRs. This suggests that, under the conditions of our study, both the naive approach and more advanced statistical methods yield comparable results in terms of ASR. In the future, this could enable wildlife managers to make informed decisions with minimal effort and cost using tools that do not require complex analysis. If desired, additional ecological information can be derived from advanced statistical methods, such as occupancy modeling, allowing more nuanced interpretations of spatiotemporal behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70139
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Red deer adult sex ratio: comparing three approaches using camera trap data

Klaus Hackländer, Hendrik Edelhoff, Horst Leitner, Stephanie Wohlfahrt
Journal of Wildlife Management
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Red deer adult sex ratio: comparing three approaches using camera trap data

Klaus Hackländer, Hendrik Edelhoff, Horst Leitner, Stephanie Wohlfahrt
article en

Abstract

Abstract European forests face severe challenges due to climate change, highlighting the importance of tree species diversity for regeneration. The management of browsing species such as red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) is therefore crucial. An important metric for managing population size is the adult sex ratio (ASR), for example, derived from camera trap data. In our study, we address 2 issues specific to camera trap methods separately: avoiding the loss of information contained in the proportion of unknown‐sex sightings and accounting for sex‐specific detection probabilities. Our hypothesis was that these advanced statistical methods reveal a potential bias in the estimation of red deer ASR in a naive approach directly from raw camera trap data. We conducted research in an alpine area of Austria from January 2020 to May 2022. We chose weeks 9 to 17 in spring to obtain pre‐hunting and pre‐birth data. We included unknown‐sex sightings (8.9% of all sightings) with predicted sex (precision of 75%) in the ASR estimation after conducting a model selection process with the goal of the highest precision in prediction. These predicted ASRs showed a non‐significant slight shift towards males, indicating a more balanced ASR than a naive ASR. To include sex‐specific detection probabilities, we ran a Royle Nichols occupancy model for both sexes and calculated ASR from estimated latent abundances. Contrary to our expectations, there were no significant differences between the occupancy‐based ASRs and the naive or predicted ASRs. This suggests that, under the conditions of our study, both the naive approach and more advanced statistical methods yield comparable results in terms of ASR. In the future, this could enable wildlife managers to make informed decisions with minimal effort and cost using tools that do not require complex analysis. If desired, additional ecological information can be derived from advanced statistical methods, such as occupancy modeling, allowing more nuanced interpretations of spatiotemporal behavior.

Journal of Wildlife ManagementVol. 90(1)
Deutsche Diabetes Stiftung (DE), Bayerische Landesanstalt für Wald und Forstwirtschaft (DE), Carinthian Economic Promotion Fund (AT), BOKU University (AT)
European Commission, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Bundesministerium für Nachhaltigkeit und Tourismus, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.