“Nobody’s Children”: The Racial History of Parental Rights Law in Foster Care

While scholars show that child protection is tied to the regulation of motherhood, we know little about how mothers of color were treated in early child welfare history. To address this gap, this article traces how racial logics of maternal unfitness emerged in foster care services and shaped parental rights. Using case files and archival documents from New York child welfare agencies, this study establishes the racial myth of the “uninterested mother,” describing a perceived crisis of child abandonment in foster care. This myth emerged as a growing psychologization of motherhood converged with the realities of urban poverty that drove mothers of color to foster their children. At a time when struggling parents willingly chose foster placement, I show that welfare authorities began to limit foster care use and enforce women’s obligation to care for their children. In the late 1950s, reformers passed the “permanent neglect” statute to discourage the abandonment of children in foster care, and in doing so, reframed this service as temporary, punitive, and involuntary. The “uninterested mother” is an important racial myth about gender dependency in child welfare that offers new insight into the system’s shift from a welfare service to an authoritative one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gender & Society
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432251391789
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Nobody’s Children”: The Racial History of Parental Rights Law in Foster Care

Michaela Christy Simmons
Gender & Society
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

“Nobody’s Children”: The Racial History of Parental Rights Law in Foster Care

Michaela Christy Simmons
article en

Abstract

While scholars show that child protection is tied to the regulation of motherhood, we know little about how mothers of color were treated in early child welfare history. To address this gap, this article traces how racial logics of maternal unfitness emerged in foster care services and shaped parental rights. Using case files and archival documents from New York child welfare agencies, this study establishes the racial myth of the “uninterested mother,” describing a perceived crisis of child abandonment in foster care. This myth emerged as a growing psychologization of motherhood converged with the realities of urban poverty that drove mothers of color to foster their children. At a time when struggling parents willingly chose foster placement, I show that welfare authorities began to limit foster care use and enforce women’s obligation to care for their children. In the late 1950s, reformers passed the “permanent neglect” statute to discourage the abandonment of children in foster care, and in doing so, reframed this service as temporary, punitive, and involuntary. The “uninterested mother” is an important racial myth about gender dependency in child welfare that offers new insight into the system’s shift from a welfare service to an authoritative one.

Gender & SocietyVol. 39(6)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.