Perspectives on the measurement of self‐perceived cognitive function in older adults
Professionals see a need for a harmonized tool to measure cognitive concerns.Professionals have diverse preferences for measurement content and its validation.Item relevance as seen by professionals aligned considerably with statistical value.Integration of statistical information with expert and patient opinion is crucial.
Authors
- Douglas Tommet
- Mark A. Dubbelman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5708-4925)
- Elke Butterbrod (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-1455)
- Wiesje M. van der Flier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8766-6224)
- Frank Jessen
- Paul K. Crane (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-7465)
- Richard N. Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1049-218X)
- Sietske A.M. Sikkes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-3656)
- Laura A. Rabin
- Katherine A. Gifford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6232-9408)
Institutions
- TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- Boston University (US)
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- City University of New York (US)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- University of Washington (US)
- Brown University (US)
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Brooklyn College (US)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
- Published
- 2025-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70158
- Primary Topic
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Alzheimer's Association