Digital technology and securitisation in humanitarian field security: unpacking bunkerisation risks and operational challenges

Abstract Humanitarian operations in high-risk environments face escalating security threats that have transformed both organisational practices and relationships with affected populations. Digital technologies continue to influence securitisation in humanitarian field security often playing a key role in reinforcing bunkerisation. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with eight experienced UNHCR personnel working in fragile contexts, this paper argues that while technological tools enhance operational safety, they may also inadvertently restrict humanitarian access, raising tensions between operational effectiveness and humanitarian principles. Findings indicate that technologies such as biometric registration, satellite tracking, and encrypted communications strengthen situational awareness and staff protection, but can also perpetuate a security-first operational culture, resulting in reduced community engagement and constrained humanitarian outreach. The study concludes that humanitarian organisations must critically assess how security technologies are deployed to avoid reinforcing exclusionary practices, and recommends that effective security strategies must integrate technology and protective infrastructures with acceptance-based approaches that foreground dignity, trust, and equitable protection across staff enabling them to fulfil their humanitarian mandates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Humanitarian Action
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-025-00179-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital technology and securitisation in humanitarian field security: unpacking bunkerisation risks and operational challenges

Bishnu Pariyar, Johnny Brookwell
1 citations
Journal of International Humanitarian Action
Global Security and Public Health
4.20
article

Digital technology and securitisation in humanitarian field security: unpacking bunkerisation risks and operational challenges

Bishnu Pariyar, Johnny Brookwell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Humanitarian operations in high-risk environments face escalating security threats that have transformed both organisational practices and relationships with affected populations. Digital technologies continue to influence securitisation in humanitarian field security often playing a key role in reinforcing bunkerisation. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with eight experienced UNHCR personnel working in fragile contexts, this paper argues that while technological tools enhance operational safety, they may also inadvertently restrict humanitarian access, raising tensions between operational effectiveness and humanitarian principles. Findings indicate that technologies such as biometric registration, satellite tracking, and encrypted communications strengthen situational awareness and staff protection, but can also perpetuate a security-first operational culture, resulting in reduced community engagement and constrained humanitarian outreach. The study concludes that humanitarian organisations must critically assess how security technologies are deployed to avoid reinforcing exclusionary practices, and recommends that effective security strategies must integrate technology and protective infrastructures with acceptance-based approaches that foreground dignity, trust, and equitable protection across staff enabling them to fulfil their humanitarian mandates.

Journal of International Humanitarian ActionVol. 10(1)
University of Leicester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Security and Public Health
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.