Impact of collective orientation on the quality of teamwork of emergency medical personnel in simulated prehospital emergency medical care - a prospective observational study

High-responsibility teams in prehospital emergency medicine regularly face multidimensional challenges. Collaboration in such teams is vital for the care, safety and outcome of our patients. Collective Orientation (CO) is simply defined as the individual willingness to work with others in a team. Collective Orientation has been proven to have a positive effect on team performance in clinical healthcare. However, data on prehospital emergency medicine is still lacking. This prospective observational study measured the collective orientation of n = 64 paramedic students in their third year of training using a validated questionnaire. Teams were formed based on the students’ collective orientation (high or low). Two simulation scenarios (tension pneumothorax and bronchospasm) were evaluated using the Time Key Item Product (TKIP) and Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). There was no significant difference in the speed and completeness of patient care (TKIP) between low (M = 6605) and high (M = 6967) Collective Orientation (p = 0.133). There was no significant difference in time to diagnosis between low (M = 384 s) and high (M = 405 s) CO (p = 0.128). Teams with high CO undoubtedly achieved better results in teamwork-relevant factors. These factors include leadership (p = 0,031), teamwork (p = 0,052) and task management (p = 0,038). There was no significant difference between low and high CO when using cognitive aids (p = 0,471) or the 10-for-10 principle (p = 0,735). Collective Orientation must be considered a component of paramedics’ competence to act in paramedic education, as it is characteristic of good teamwork. Further research is needed. The study suggests that Collective Orientation only works in highly complex emergencies outside of linear standard operating procedures or when combined with unanticipated complications. It is clear that leading symptoms that require a wide differential diagnosis demonstrate the value of a high collective orientation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Emergency Medicine
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01399-2
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of collective orientation on the quality of teamwork of emergency medical personnel in simulated prehospital emergency medical care - a prospective observational study

Vera Hagemann, John C. Tedesco, Hendrik Eismann, Markus Flentje et al.
BMC Emergency Medicine
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Impact of collective orientation on the quality of teamwork of emergency medical personnel in simulated prehospital emergency medical care - a prospective observational study

Vera Hagemann, John C. Tedesco, Hendrik Eismann, Markus Flentje, Lennart Meyer, Gordon Heringshausen
article en

Abstract

High-responsibility teams in prehospital emergency medicine regularly face multidimensional challenges. Collaboration in such teams is vital for the care, safety and outcome of our patients. Collective Orientation (CO) is simply defined as the individual willingness to work with others in a team. Collective Orientation has been proven to have a positive effect on team performance in clinical healthcare. However, data on prehospital emergency medicine is still lacking. This prospective observational study measured the collective orientation of n = 64 paramedic students in their third year of training using a validated questionnaire. Teams were formed based on the students’ collective orientation (high or low). Two simulation scenarios (tension pneumothorax and bronchospasm) were evaluated using the Time Key Item Product (TKIP) and Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). There was no significant difference in the speed and completeness of patient care (TKIP) between low (M = 6605) and high (M = 6967) Collective Orientation (p = 0.133). There was no significant difference in time to diagnosis between low (M = 384 s) and high (M = 405 s) CO (p = 0.128). Teams with high CO undoubtedly achieved better results in teamwork-relevant factors. These factors include leadership (p = 0,031), teamwork (p = 0,052) and task management (p = 0,038). There was no significant difference between low and high CO when using cognitive aids (p = 0,471) or the 10-for-10 principle (p = 0,735). Collective Orientation must be considered a component of paramedics’ competence to act in paramedic education, as it is characteristic of good teamwork. Further research is needed. The study suggests that Collective Orientation only works in highly complex emergencies outside of linear standard operating procedures or when combined with unanticipated complications. It is clear that leading symptoms that require a wide differential diagnosis demonstrate the value of a high collective orientation.

BMC Emergency MedicineVol. 25(1)
University of Bremen (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), AKAD University (DE), West Coast University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.