Antitrust deregulation and long-term performance of acquiring firms

This study analyzes the impact of antitrust deregulation in 2007 on the long-term performance of acquiring firms using data from 1,185 completed mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in Korea from 1999 to 2017. We measure performance using a 12-month buy-and-hold cumulative abnormal average return estimated with the difference-in-differences model. We find that, on average, shareholder returns on horizontal acquisitions are significantly higher. However, no evidence indicates whether increased market power or improved cost efficiency drives this relationship. For M&A in chaebol firms, firm value decreases significantly after a merger. Based on this finding, we argue that the overall decline in chaebol firm value stems from M&A mainly pursued for tunneling purposes. The subsample analyses demonstrate that managerial entrenchment problems cause a decline in the value of chaebol firms. However, no evidence supports the market power and cost efficiency hypotheses regarding non-chaebol firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104737
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antitrust deregulation and long-term performance of acquiring firms

Chune Young Chung, Huy Pham, Jaeyoon Lee
International Review of Economics & Finance
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Antitrust deregulation and long-term performance of acquiring firms

Chune Young Chung, Huy Pham, Jaeyoon Lee
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of antitrust deregulation in 2007 on the long-term performance of acquiring firms using data from 1,185 completed mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in Korea from 1999 to 2017. We measure performance using a 12-month buy-and-hold cumulative abnormal average return estimated with the difference-in-differences model. We find that, on average, shareholder returns on horizontal acquisitions are significantly higher. However, no evidence indicates whether increased market power or improved cost efficiency drives this relationship. For M&A in chaebol firms, firm value decreases significantly after a merger. Based on this finding, we argue that the overall decline in chaebol firm value stems from M&A mainly pursued for tunneling purposes. The subsample analyses demonstrate that managerial entrenchment problems cause a decline in the value of chaebol firms. However, no evidence supports the market power and cost efficiency hypotheses regarding non-chaebol firms.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 104
RMIT Vietnam (VN), Chung-Ang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Antitrust deregulation and long-term performance of acquiring firms — Chune Young Chung, Huy Pham, et al. · International Review of Economics & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS