Machine learning-based winter wheat yield prediction using multisource data

Accurate crop yield prediction and understanding its underlying factors facilitate better food supply management and more informed decision-making. To forecast crop yield, the majority of previous studies have utilized vegetation indices and meteorological data. However, other important factors are often overlooked. Moreover, the temporal influence of input variables has been underexplored in prior research. To fill these gaps, we integrated a diverse range of satellite-based data, including vegetation indices and actual evapotranspiration (ET a ), with climate and soil information. Then, the input variables were narrowed down using a feature selection approach to provide the most relevant variables for predictive models. Three machine learning algorithms, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and Linear Regression (LR), were trained to forecast winter wheat yield across Oklahoma and Kansas counties. The models were trained on 2014–2021 data and tested on 2022–2023 yields. According to the results, XGBoost emerged as the most accurate algorithm in both test years. It achieved an R² of 0.71 (RMSE = 0.46 t ha −1 ) in 2022 and an R² of 0.63 (RMSE = 0.60 t ha −1 ) in 2023 when using the selected feature set. For most models, particularly in 2022, using the selected features instead of the entire set improved the accuracy. We also found that ET a is a promising factor in yield prediction, as it was selected multiple times across the growing season in the feature selection process. Additionally, correlation analysis showed that April and May, which are two to three months before harvest, were the most sensitive months in shaping the final yield. • The influence of variables on wheat yield was assessed using correlation analysis and feature selection. • XGBoost performed better than LR and RF. • Feature selection enhanced model accuracy in most cases compared to using all available variables. • ET a provided useful information for wheat yield forecasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109951
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning-based winter wheat yield prediction using multisource data

Ali Abbasi, Seyed Arash Khosravani Shariati
1 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
article

Machine learning-based winter wheat yield prediction using multisource data

Ali Abbasi, Seyed Arash Khosravani Shariati
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate crop yield prediction and understanding its underlying factors facilitate better food supply management and more informed decision-making. To forecast crop yield, the majority of previous studies have utilized vegetation indices and meteorological data. However, other important factors are often overlooked. Moreover, the temporal influence of input variables has been underexplored in prior research. To fill these gaps, we integrated a diverse range of satellite-based data, including vegetation indices and actual evapotranspiration (ET a ), with climate and soil information. Then, the input variables were narrowed down using a feature selection approach to provide the most relevant variables for predictive models. Three machine learning algorithms, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and Linear Regression (LR), were trained to forecast winter wheat yield across Oklahoma and Kansas counties. The models were trained on 2014–2021 data and tested on 2022–2023 yields. According to the results, XGBoost emerged as the most accurate algorithm in both test years. It achieved an R² of 0.71 (RMSE = 0.46 t ha −1 ) in 2022 and an R² of 0.63 (RMSE = 0.60 t ha −1 ) in 2023 when using the selected feature set. For most models, particularly in 2022, using the selected features instead of the entire set improved the accuracy. We also found that ET a is a promising factor in yield prediction, as it was selected multiple times across the growing season in the feature selection process. Additionally, correlation analysis showed that April and May, which are two to three months before harvest, were the most sensitive months in shaping the final yield. • The influence of variables on wheat yield was assessed using correlation analysis and feature selection. • XGBoost performed better than LR and RF. • Feature selection enhanced model accuracy in most cases compared to using all available variables. • ET a provided useful information for wheat yield forecasting.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 322
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.