Not One Method to Rule Them All: A Comparative Study of Chromatographic Platforms (RP-LC-, HILIC-, SFC-, and IC-HRMS) for Water Analysis

Reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (RP-LC-HRMS) is the standard for nontarget screening (NTS) of environmental samples but lacks retention of highly polar contaminants. We compared 12 chromatographic methods across four platforms, RP-LC, anion chromatography (IC), supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), using 127 environmentally relevant compounds (log<i>D</i><sub>pH7.4</sub> -5.6 to 6.6). Compounds were analyzed in solvent and for a polar subset, in groundwater enriched by vacuum evaporation. Data were collected across four laboratories using 5 RP-LC-, 3 HILIC-, 2 SFC-, and 2 IC-HRMS setups. Feature detection with standard tools yielded more false negatives for SFC and IC. To enable a fair and method-agnostic comparison, an extracted ion chromatogram (EIC)-based workflow was used. Of the 127 compounds, 125 were detected by at least one platform. For log<i>D</i><sub>pH7.4</sub> > 0, RP-LC covered ∼90%, followed by SFC (∼70%), while IC and HILIC each covered <30%. For very polar compounds (log<i>D</i><sub>pH7.4</sub> < 0), coverage dropped across all platforms. SFC and HILIC detected up to 60% of polar analytes; IC performed better in negative ionization mode, consistent with anion-exchange separation. Detection frequency declined with polarity, reflecting analytical limitations. Combining RP-LC with either SFC or HILIC increased coverage to 94%. In spiked groundwater, coverage was lower (73%) due to matrix effects and losses during vacuum enrichment. Peak widths were narrowest for SFC (∼2.5 s) and RP-LC (∼4 s) and broadest for HILIC (∼7 s) and IC (∼17 s). Retention times showed limited cross-platform correlation while ionization efficiency was consistent, except for SFC. As no single method provided full coverage, combining RP-LC with one complementary platform (SFC, HILIC, or IC) is required to extend chemical space in environmental NTS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c04114
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not One Method to Rule Them All: A Comparative Study of Chromatographic Platforms (RP-LC-, HILIC-, SFC-, and IC-HRMS) for Water Analysis

Jan H. Christensen, Nanna Hjort Vidkjær, Tobias Bader, Selina Tisler et al.
1 citations
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
0.76
article

Not One Method to Rule Them All: A Comparative Study of Chromatographic Platforms (RP-LC-, HILIC-, SFC-, and IC-HRMS) for Water Analysis

Jan H. Christensen, Nanna Hjort Vidkjær, Tobias Bader, Selina Tisler, Ulla E. Bollmann, Jonathan Zweigle, Michael P. Schlüsener, Joana Flottmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (RP-LC-HRMS) is the standard for nontarget screening (NTS) of environmental samples but lacks retention of highly polar contaminants. We compared 12 chromatographic methods across four platforms, RP-LC, anion chromatography (IC), supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), using 127 environmentally relevant compounds (log<i>D</i><sub>pH7.4</sub> -5.6 to 6.6). Compounds were analyzed in solvent and for a polar subset, in groundwater enriched by vacuum evaporation. Data were collected across four laboratories using 5 RP-LC-, 3 HILIC-, 2 SFC-, and 2 IC-HRMS setups. Feature detection with standard tools yielded more false negatives for SFC and IC. To enable a fair and method-agnostic comparison, an extracted ion chromatogram (EIC)-based workflow was used. Of the 127 compounds, 125 were detected by at least one platform. For log<i>D</i><sub>pH7.4</sub> > 0, RP-LC covered ∼90%, followed by SFC (∼70%), while IC and HILIC each covered <30%. For very polar compounds (log<i>D</i><sub>pH7.4</sub> < 0), coverage dropped across all platforms. SFC and HILIC detected up to 60% of polar analytes; IC performed better in negative ionization mode, consistent with anion-exchange separation. Detection frequency declined with polarity, reflecting analytical limitations. Combining RP-LC with either SFC or HILIC increased coverage to 94%. In spiked groundwater, coverage was lower (73%) due to matrix effects and losses during vacuum enrichment. Peak widths were narrowest for SFC (∼2.5 s) and RP-LC (∼4 s) and broadest for HILIC (∼7 s) and IC (∼17 s). Retention times showed limited cross-platform correlation while ionization efficiency was consistent, except for SFC. As no single method provided full coverage, combining RP-LC with one complementary platform (SFC, HILIC, or IC) is required to extend chemical space in environmental NTS.

Analytical ChemistryVol. 97(45)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (DK), Landeswasserversorgung (Germany) (DE), Federal Institute of Hydrology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
0.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.