S1168 Towards an Optimal Body Position and Device for Performing Balloon Expulsion Test

Introduction: Assessment of defecation using a surrogate stool is an essential test for evaluation of anorectal disorders. However, body position and type of balloon device has been suggested to affect the results of balloon expulsion test (BET), but has not been systematically assessed. To prospectively assess and compare results of BET in 2 different body positions, and by using 2 different balloon devices. Methods: In a randomized order, healthy subjects performed the BET by using 2 different devices (50cc water-filled balloon and 30cc Foley balloon), and in 2 different positions, either sitting on a commode or by squatting using a specially designed motorized toilet that raises the feet from a sitting to squatting position. For each device and position, subjects were asked to report if the device/position simulated their sensation of having a bowel movement and describe the straining effort and discomfort. Results: Twenty healthy volunteers (11 women, 9 men; mean age = 44 ± 15 years) participated in the study. The mean BET of the 50cc water-filled balloon in both the sitting (29.8 secs, 95% CI [8.2–51.4]) and squatting positions (25.2 secs, 95% CI [0-55.1]) were significantly shorter (P = < .001, P = < .001) than the Foley balloon respectively. Five subjects (25%) could not expel the Foley balloon in both the sitting and squatting positions, but the squatting position had a significantly shorter expulsion time than sitting position (P = .037). The BET of 50cc balloon was similar between the sitting and squatting positions (P = .504). Subjects reported significantly more straining and discomfort with Foley catheter compared to the 50cc party balloon (P < .001). However, both devices induced a similar sensation to defecate. Conclusion: The 50cc water-filled balloon should be used as the standard device for balloon expulsion test. Our data reaffirms the published normative values of less than 1 minute. On average, healthy subjects took 2 minutes to expel foley balloon and 25% failed and it caused more discomfort, suggesting that it is an inappropriate device for BET. Squatting position using a motorized toilet may be preferable to a standard commode as it promotes a more natural evacuation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132132.16424.a9
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1168 Towards an Optimal Body Position and Device for Performing Balloon Expulsion Test

Delaram Asadi, Yan Yun, Satish S.C. Rao, Danielle Long et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

S1168 Towards an Optimal Body Position and Device for Performing Balloon Expulsion Test

Delaram Asadi, Yan Yun, Satish S.C. Rao, Danielle Long, Neelima Reddy, Karlo Fidel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment of defecation using a surrogate stool is an essential test for evaluation of anorectal disorders. However, body position and type of balloon device has been suggested to affect the results of balloon expulsion test (BET), but has not been systematically assessed. To prospectively assess and compare results of BET in 2 different body positions, and by using 2 different balloon devices. Methods: In a randomized order, healthy subjects performed the BET by using 2 different devices (50cc water-filled balloon and 30cc Foley balloon), and in 2 different positions, either sitting on a commode or by squatting using a specially designed motorized toilet that raises the feet from a sitting to squatting position. For each device and position, subjects were asked to report if the device/position simulated their sensation of having a bowel movement and describe the straining effort and discomfort. Results: Twenty healthy volunteers (11 women, 9 men; mean age = 44 ± 15 years) participated in the study. The mean BET of the 50cc water-filled balloon in both the sitting (29.8 secs, 95% CI [8.2–51.4]) and squatting positions (25.2 secs, 95% CI [0-55.1]) were significantly shorter (P = < .001, P = < .001) than the Foley balloon respectively. Five subjects (25%) could not expel the Foley balloon in both the sitting and squatting positions, but the squatting position had a significantly shorter expulsion time than sitting position (P = .037). The BET of 50cc balloon was similar between the sitting and squatting positions (P = .504). Subjects reported significantly more straining and discomfort with Foley catheter compared to the 50cc party balloon (P < .001). However, both devices induced a similar sensation to defecate. Conclusion: The 50cc water-filled balloon should be used as the standard device for balloon expulsion test. Our data reaffirms the published normative values of less than 1 minute. On average, healthy subjects took 2 minutes to expel foley balloon and 25% failed and it caused more discomfort, suggesting that it is an inappropriate device for BET. Squatting position using a motorized toilet may be preferable to a standard commode as it promotes a more natural evacuation.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.