S4463 Holding Back Malignancy-Related Hemorrhage With Esophageal Stenting

Introduction: Self-expanding metal stents are commonly placed as palliative treatment in patients with esophageal malignancy to maintain luminal patency. Studies suggest endoscopic stent placement in this scenario can reduce the risk of developing esophageal bleeds. While the use of self-expanding stents to control refractory variceal bleeds has been described, available studies have not investigated the efficacy of stent placement to achieve hemostasis in active esophageal bleeds caused by malignancy. This case describes the application of esophageal stenting as salvage therapy for active malignancy-related bleeding. Case Description/Methods: A 64-year-old man with a prior history of stroke, Parkinson’s disease, type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, tobacco use, presenting to the emergency department with dysphagia and confusion developed hematemesis while in the emergency department, requiring intubation and urgent endoscopy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and biopsy confirmed esophageal adenocarcinoma. The patient was extubated then reintubated due to recurrent hematemesis and continued to have bloody orogastric tube output. Multidisciplinary discussions between critical care, surgical oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and gastroenterology, determined the patient was not a candidate for surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy given his clinical condition. Therefore, fluoroscopic guided endoscopic stenting was selected to control the bleeding. A 23 mm × 125 mm fully covered self-expanding metal stent was placed over a wire to cover the proximal portion of the esophageal mass. A smaller 18 mm × 119 mm metal stent was then placed distally through the initial stent in a telescopic fashion, using the esophagogastroduodenoscopy scope. No active bleeding was identified at the end of the procedure. Discussion: The patient had no evidence of rebleeding following endoscopic intervention and remained hemodynamically stable. He was later extubated and began radiation therapy. This case suggests that esophageal stenting as salvage therapy may be an effective intervention to achieve hemostasis in patients with active malignancy-related esophageal bleeds who are not candidates for additional therapy and act as a bridge to definitive treatment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001145312.02870.04
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S4463 Holding Back Malignancy-Related Hemorrhage With Esophageal Stenting

Samuel A. Levine, Gurshawn Singh
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

S4463 Holding Back Malignancy-Related Hemorrhage With Esophageal Stenting

Samuel A. Levine, Gurshawn Singh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Self-expanding metal stents are commonly placed as palliative treatment in patients with esophageal malignancy to maintain luminal patency. Studies suggest endoscopic stent placement in this scenario can reduce the risk of developing esophageal bleeds. While the use of self-expanding stents to control refractory variceal bleeds has been described, available studies have not investigated the efficacy of stent placement to achieve hemostasis in active esophageal bleeds caused by malignancy. This case describes the application of esophageal stenting as salvage therapy for active malignancy-related bleeding. Case Description/Methods: A 64-year-old man with a prior history of stroke, Parkinson’s disease, type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, tobacco use, presenting to the emergency department with dysphagia and confusion developed hematemesis while in the emergency department, requiring intubation and urgent endoscopy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and biopsy confirmed esophageal adenocarcinoma. The patient was extubated then reintubated due to recurrent hematemesis and continued to have bloody orogastric tube output. Multidisciplinary discussions between critical care, surgical oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and gastroenterology, determined the patient was not a candidate for surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy given his clinical condition. Therefore, fluoroscopic guided endoscopic stenting was selected to control the bleeding. A 23 mm × 125 mm fully covered self-expanding metal stent was placed over a wire to cover the proximal portion of the esophageal mass. A smaller 18 mm × 119 mm metal stent was then placed distally through the initial stent in a telescopic fashion, using the esophagogastroduodenoscopy scope. No active bleeding was identified at the end of the procedure. Discussion: The patient had no evidence of rebleeding following endoscopic intervention and remained hemodynamically stable. He was later extubated and began radiation therapy. This case suggests that esophageal stenting as salvage therapy may be an effective intervention to achieve hemostasis in patients with active malignancy-related esophageal bleeds who are not candidates for additional therapy and act as a bridge to definitive treatment.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S4463 Holding Back Malignancy-Related Hemorrhage With Esophageal Stenting — Samuel A. Levine, Gurshawn Singh · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS