S1171 In the Gray Zone: Post-Diagnostic Journeys of Patients With Equivocal Anorectal Manometry Results

Introduction: Anorectal manometry (ARM) with balloon expulsion testing (BET) is an important tool for evaluating defecatory disorders. When ARM and BET results are equivocal, patients are often recommended MR defecography for further evaluation, although it is unclear what proportion of patients proceed with additional testing. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients who obtained an ARM and BET between January and March 2024 at a single tertiary care center. Our primary outcome was the percentage of patients who underwent MR defecography within 1 year of equivocal anorectal manometry results. Results: Of the 97 included participants, 71 (73%) were women, 41 (42%) were White. A total of 76 (78%) were referred for constipation, 17 (18%) were referred for fecal incontinence, and 4 (4%) had both. Of these, 24 (25%) had equivocal results and MR defecography was recommended. Within the following year, 11 (46%) of those recommended for MR defecography had obtained the imaging, 4 (17%) went directly to biofeedback and/or pelvic physical therapy instead, 8 (33%) were lost to follow-up, and 1 (4%) decided to try an alternative treatment. Of the 11 patients who underwent MR defecography, 6 (55%) passed the balloon expulsion test, 9 (82%) had rectal hyposensitivity, and 3 (27%) were referred by a motility specialist. Additionally, based on the results of MR defecography for these patients, 7 (64%) started or planned for pelvic floor physical therapy/biofeedback therapy, 1 (8%) did not demonstrate findings warranting biofeedback or pelvic physical therapy, and 3 (25%) were lost to follow up. Conclusion: Less than half of the patients referred for MR defecography obtained imaging within 1 year after equivocal ARM and BET results. Clinicians should carefully consider who may ultimately benefit from MR defecography versus an early referral for biofeedback or pelvic physical therapy, as many patients may not obtain additional testing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132144.40995.21
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1171 In the Gray Zone: Post-Diagnostic Journeys of Patients With Equivocal Anorectal Manometry Results

Yuying Luo, Madison R. Heath, Priyanka Singh
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

S1171 In the Gray Zone: Post-Diagnostic Journeys of Patients With Equivocal Anorectal Manometry Results

Yuying Luo, Madison R. Heath, Priyanka Singh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Anorectal manometry (ARM) with balloon expulsion testing (BET) is an important tool for evaluating defecatory disorders. When ARM and BET results are equivocal, patients are often recommended MR defecography for further evaluation, although it is unclear what proportion of patients proceed with additional testing. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients who obtained an ARM and BET between January and March 2024 at a single tertiary care center. Our primary outcome was the percentage of patients who underwent MR defecography within 1 year of equivocal anorectal manometry results. Results: Of the 97 included participants, 71 (73%) were women, 41 (42%) were White. A total of 76 (78%) were referred for constipation, 17 (18%) were referred for fecal incontinence, and 4 (4%) had both. Of these, 24 (25%) had equivocal results and MR defecography was recommended. Within the following year, 11 (46%) of those recommended for MR defecography had obtained the imaging, 4 (17%) went directly to biofeedback and/or pelvic physical therapy instead, 8 (33%) were lost to follow-up, and 1 (4%) decided to try an alternative treatment. Of the 11 patients who underwent MR defecography, 6 (55%) passed the balloon expulsion test, 9 (82%) had rectal hyposensitivity, and 3 (27%) were referred by a motility specialist. Additionally, based on the results of MR defecography for these patients, 7 (64%) started or planned for pelvic floor physical therapy/biofeedback therapy, 1 (8%) did not demonstrate findings warranting biofeedback or pelvic physical therapy, and 3 (25%) were lost to follow up. Conclusion: Less than half of the patients referred for MR defecography obtained imaging within 1 year after equivocal ARM and BET results. Clinicians should carefully consider who may ultimately benefit from MR defecography versus an early referral for biofeedback or pelvic physical therapy, as many patients may not obtain additional testing.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.