The legislative obsolescence of community control surveillance ordinances

In 2016, the American Civil Liberties Union launched a national initiative to introduce community input and oversight ordinances over governmental procurements of surveillance and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in cities across the United States. Community Control (or input) Over Police Surveillance ordinances have proven that a legislative focus on procurement leaves crucial holes in use and data commodification capacities by local law enforcement agencies, while a 2025 executive order has effectively nullified community input ordinances by making military and homeland security resources, including AI, available to law enforcement agencies to supress political dissent and conduct confrontational immigration raids. Though local budgetary and legislative efforts have been a focal point of abolitionist political organizing related to public safety over the last decade, the advancement of AI and its deployment for unconstitutional activities by multiple tiers of law enforcement agencies necessitates new ways of thinking about proactive dissent against rising authoritarianism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251386927
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The legislative obsolescence of community control surveillance ordinances

Rae Baker
Dialogues on Digital Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The legislative obsolescence of community control surveillance ordinances

Rae Baker
article en

Abstract

In 2016, the American Civil Liberties Union launched a national initiative to introduce community input and oversight ordinances over governmental procurements of surveillance and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in cities across the United States. Community Control (or input) Over Police Surveillance ordinances have proven that a legislative focus on procurement leaves crucial holes in use and data commodification capacities by local law enforcement agencies, while a 2025 executive order has effectively nullified community input ordinances by making military and homeland security resources, including AI, available to law enforcement agencies to supress political dissent and conduct confrontational immigration raids. Though local budgetary and legislative efforts have been a focal point of abolitionist political organizing related to public safety over the last decade, the advancement of AI and its deployment for unconstitutional activities by multiple tiers of law enforcement agencies necessitates new ways of thinking about proactive dissent against rising authoritarianism.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(3)
Research for Action (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.