A systematic literature study on organizational communication in libraries

Research on organizational communication in libraries has not been extensively conducted. This study aims to evaluate the current state of research on this subject. A systematic literature review method was utilized. The inclusion criteria focused on studies of organizational communication in libraries and research papers written in English. Searches were conducted in Scopus and ScienceDirect on 14 July 2025. To assess the risk of bias in the included studies, a quality assessment was employed. The analysis involved a thorough reading of the articles, followed by the creation of categories based on their content. Guided by the PRISMA framework, 27 articles published between 1995 and 2025 were analyzed. This review identifies two main categories, i.e. general studies and focused studies examining specific aspects of organizational communication. Most studies employed quantitative methods with descriptive statistics, while qualitative and mixed methods remain underutilized. It proposes practical and policy-level recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFLA Journal
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251392131
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic literature study on organizational communication in libraries

Ute Lies Siti Khadijah, Arief Wicaksono, Atwar Bajari, Ninis Agustini Damayani
IFLA Journal
Library Science and Information Literacy
article

A systematic literature study on organizational communication in libraries

Ute Lies Siti Khadijah, Arief Wicaksono, Atwar Bajari, Ninis Agustini Damayani
article en

Abstract

Research on organizational communication in libraries has not been extensively conducted. This study aims to evaluate the current state of research on this subject. A systematic literature review method was utilized. The inclusion criteria focused on studies of organizational communication in libraries and research papers written in English. Searches were conducted in Scopus and ScienceDirect on 14 July 2025. To assess the risk of bias in the included studies, a quality assessment was employed. The analysis involved a thorough reading of the articles, followed by the creation of categories based on their content. Guided by the PRISMA framework, 27 articles published between 1995 and 2025 were analyzed. This review identifies two main categories, i.e. general studies and focused studies examining specific aspects of organizational communication. Most studies employed quantitative methods with descriptive statistics, while qualitative and mixed methods remain underutilized. It proposes practical and policy-level recommendations.

IFLA Journal
Padjadjaran University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Library Science and Information Literacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A systematic literature study on organizational communication in libraries — Ute Lies Siti Khadijah, Arief Wicaksono, et al. · IFLA Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS