Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients in Texas Using Classical and Machine Learning Methods

Background Breast cancer is considered one of the most common cancers in women worldwide. In this study, we used an 11-year cohort of malignant breast cancer survival data in Texas to investigate the factors that might explain why some breast cancer patients live longer than others. Methods We performed standard survival analyses, including generating Kaplan‒Meier survival curves, using the log-rank test, and applying Cox proportional hazards regression to identify the unique features of breast cancer patients and determine the main factors influencing long-term survival. We also conducted a Random Survival Forest analysis for classification and prediction. Finally, we used Mahalanobis matching distance to estimate the average extended lifetime of patients in different groups. Results Our study found that stage, laterality, age, grade, subtypes, progesterone receptor status, the primary site of cancer, patient race, median household income, chemotherapy, systemic therapy, and surgery are significant factors, with stage being the most critical for predicting survival in breast cancer patients. Compared to individuals with localized-stage breast cancer, those with distant-stage cancer had a higher hazard ratio (15.869). We also observed that patients diagnosed at the localized stage had an average survival of approximately 67.34 months, compared to those diagnosed at the distant stage. Conclusion Policymakers should focus on promoting early diagnosis and screening, while also providing additional support to the elderly and those in disadvantaged circumstances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96250
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients in Texas Using Classical and Machine Learning Methods

Salique H. Shaham, Everardo Cobos, Tamer F. Oraby, Sidketa Ida Fofana et al.
Cureus
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients in Texas Using Classical and Machine Learning Methods

Salique H. Shaham, Everardo Cobos, Tamer F. Oraby, Sidketa Ida Fofana, Manish K. Tripathi
article en

Abstract

Background Breast cancer is considered one of the most common cancers in women worldwide. In this study, we used an 11-year cohort of malignant breast cancer survival data in Texas to investigate the factors that might explain why some breast cancer patients live longer than others. Methods We performed standard survival analyses, including generating Kaplan‒Meier survival curves, using the log-rank test, and applying Cox proportional hazards regression to identify the unique features of breast cancer patients and determine the main factors influencing long-term survival. We also conducted a Random Survival Forest analysis for classification and prediction. Finally, we used Mahalanobis matching distance to estimate the average extended lifetime of patients in different groups. Results Our study found that stage, laterality, age, grade, subtypes, progesterone receptor status, the primary site of cancer, patient race, median household income, chemotherapy, systemic therapy, and surgery are significant factors, with stage being the most critical for predicting survival in breast cancer patients. Compared to individuals with localized-stage breast cancer, those with distant-stage cancer had a higher hazard ratio (15.869). We also observed that patients diagnosed at the localized stage had an average survival of approximately 67.34 months, compared to those diagnosed at the distant stage. Conclusion Policymakers should focus on promoting early diagnosis and screening, while also providing additional support to the elderly and those in disadvantaged circumstances.

CureusVol. 17(11)
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.