What are you thinking when you coach? An exploration of tennis coaches' cognitions using stimulated recall

To date, much sports coaching research has tended to focus on components such as decision-making, knowledge structures, and mental models. However, limited attention has been given to the “types of thinking” coaches engage in when coaching athletes in situ. This gap in the research literature is problematic for both coaches and coach developers in improving coaching practice. Therefore, we explored tennis coaches’ cognitive processes (i.e., the what) and their type (i.e., the how). Using stimulated recall interviews (a knowledge elicitation method based on watching video recordings of one's own practice), data were collected from four expert tennis coaches within coaching sessions ( n = 8). In addition, ( n = 4) background interviews were conducted to help make sense of the data and inform the stimulated recall interview questions. A Reflexive Thematic Analysis revealed a framework of nine higher psychological functions (noticing, questioning, confirming, risk evaluation, forecasting, contextualizing, normalizing, problem-solving, and deductive reasoning) in which coaches engage during coaching practice. These findings have potential theoretical and practical applications in sports coaching practice and coach development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251391779
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are you thinking when you coach? An exploration of tennis coaches' cognitions using stimulated recall

Timothy M. Baghurst, Simon Nicholas Quick, Terri Taylor
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

What are you thinking when you coach? An exploration of tennis coaches' cognitions using stimulated recall

Timothy M. Baghurst, Simon Nicholas Quick, Terri Taylor
article en

Abstract

To date, much sports coaching research has tended to focus on components such as decision-making, knowledge structures, and mental models. However, limited attention has been given to the “types of thinking” coaches engage in when coaching athletes in situ. This gap in the research literature is problematic for both coaches and coach developers in improving coaching practice. Therefore, we explored tennis coaches’ cognitive processes (i.e., the what) and their type (i.e., the how). Using stimulated recall interviews (a knowledge elicitation method based on watching video recordings of one's own practice), data were collected from four expert tennis coaches within coaching sessions ( n = 8). In addition, ( n = 4) background interviews were conducted to help make sense of the data and inform the stimulated recall interview questions. A Reflexive Thematic Analysis revealed a framework of nine higher psychological functions (noticing, questioning, confirming, risk evaluation, forecasting, contextualizing, normalizing, problem-solving, and deductive reasoning) in which coaches engage during coaching practice. These findings have potential theoretical and practical applications in sports coaching practice and coach development.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Florida State University (US), University of Essex (GB), Frostburg State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.