Is It Possible to Standardize Diagnostic Decision-Making in Yoga Therapy for LBP? A Study Using AHP, BWM, RANCOM, and BCM

The primary objective of this study is to examine whether expert-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods might be used to support physiotherapists in yoga-based treatment of non-specific Lower Back Pain (LBP). LBP is one of the most common pain syndromes globally, particularly in industrialized and aging populations, and its prevalence continues to increase. This growing challenge highlights the need to develop AI-based systems that can support not only conventional medicine but also physiotherapeutic approaches to treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the application of MCDA methods in yoga-based therapy. To fill this gap, we tested four expert-based MCDA methods — Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Best - Worst Method (BWM), Ranking Comparison Method (RANCOM), and Base Criterion Method (BCM) with the support of two highly experienced physiotherapy experts. Despite minor differences, all methods delivered consistent and highly promising results, demonstrating the potential and usefulness of MCDA approaches in yoga-based treatment of LBP. The results lay the groundwork for future development of AI-supported decision-making tools tailored to physiotherapeutic and integrative treatment strategies. This research contributes to the growing body of evidence on the applicability of MCDA in healthcare and highlights its relevance in non-conventional therapeutic contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.055
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is It Possible to Standardize Diagnostic Decision-Making in Yoga Therapy for LBP? A Study Using AHP, BWM, RANCOM, and BCM

Bartłomiej Kizielewicz, Olga Apiecionek, Bogna Listewnik
Procedia Computer Science
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Is It Possible to Standardize Diagnostic Decision-Making in Yoga Therapy for LBP? A Study Using AHP, BWM, RANCOM, and BCM

Bartłomiej Kizielewicz, Olga Apiecionek, Bogna Listewnik
article en

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to examine whether expert-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods might be used to support physiotherapists in yoga-based treatment of non-specific Lower Back Pain (LBP). LBP is one of the most common pain syndromes globally, particularly in industrialized and aging populations, and its prevalence continues to increase. This growing challenge highlights the need to develop AI-based systems that can support not only conventional medicine but also physiotherapeutic approaches to treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the application of MCDA methods in yoga-based therapy. To fill this gap, we tested four expert-based MCDA methods — Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Best - Worst Method (BWM), Ranking Comparison Method (RANCOM), and Base Criterion Method (BCM) with the support of two highly experienced physiotherapy experts. Despite minor differences, all methods delivered consistent and highly promising results, demonstrating the potential and usefulness of MCDA approaches in yoga-based treatment of LBP. The results lay the groundwork for future development of AI-supported decision-making tools tailored to physiotherapeutic and integrative treatment strategies. This research contributes to the growing body of evidence on the applicability of MCDA in healthcare and highlights its relevance in non-conventional therapeutic contexts.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 270
University of Szczecin (PL), West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin (PL), National Institute of Telecommunications (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.