Comparison of CNN architectures for INTERCO

The problem of selecting the best convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture appears when dealing with a large number of classes and images. The selection problem resulted in the consideration of varying layer configurations and strategies, and the reliability of the individual deep learning models was unknown. On the other hand, as CNN architectures evolved, each new iteration proposed, from a theoretical point of view, was a more effective method for achieving better results. Thus, this was the motivation to validate the selected CNNs on image recognition and classification. This paper focuses on classifying the International Code of Signals (INTERCO) flags using different CNN architectures, including AlexNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, InceptionV3, ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B0, EfficientNet-B1, CSPNet, and ConvNeXt-Tiny. The performance validation of these architectures through the analysis of metrics such as the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, training time, number of epochs, and single-image processing time has been carried out. The results of the computational experiments are presented and discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.09.206
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of CNN architectures for INTERCO

Ireneusz Czarnowski, Juliusz Łosiński
Procedia Computer Science
Advanced Neural Network Applications
article

Comparison of CNN architectures for INTERCO

Ireneusz Czarnowski, Juliusz Łosiński
article en

Abstract

The problem of selecting the best convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture appears when dealing with a large number of classes and images. The selection problem resulted in the consideration of varying layer configurations and strategies, and the reliability of the individual deep learning models was unknown. On the other hand, as CNN architectures evolved, each new iteration proposed, from a theoretical point of view, was a more effective method for achieving better results. Thus, this was the motivation to validate the selected CNNs on image recognition and classification. This paper focuses on classifying the International Code of Signals (INTERCO) flags using different CNN architectures, including AlexNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, InceptionV3, ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B0, EfficientNet-B1, CSPNet, and ConvNeXt-Tiny. The performance validation of these architectures through the analysis of metrics such as the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, training time, number of epochs, and single-image processing time has been carried out. The results of the computational experiments are presented and discussed.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 270
Gdynia Maritime University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.