Ontology-Guided Learning Assessment: A Multi-Indicator and Feedback-Driven Approach

This paper examines assessment indicators for evaluating learning outcomes in higher education and proposes a structured framework that categorizes them into seven key areas: Content Quality, Engagement Metrics, Study Time, Assessment Indicators, Difficulty and Efficiency, Participation Metrics, and Motivation and Tracking Indicators. This framework helps educators better understand student performance and engagement. Building on this, an ontological model is introduced to standardize and organize these indicators, enhancing interoperability and supporting automated reasoning for educational decision-making. It is compatible with Learning Management Systems and includes mechanisms for generating automated feedback for timely and personalized interventions. An empirical evaluation shows the model’s effectiveness in identifying at-risk students and providing tailored feedback. The paper concludes by discussing the framework’s implications for improving assessment practices and future directions involving advanced analytics and artificial intelligence in learning outcome assessments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.09.343
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ontology-Guided Learning Assessment: A Multi-Indicator and Feedback-Driven Approach

Lilia Cheniti Belcadhi, Ghada Ben Khalifa, Alicia García-Holgadob
Procedia Computer Science
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Ontology-Guided Learning Assessment: A Multi-Indicator and Feedback-Driven Approach

Lilia Cheniti Belcadhi, Ghada Ben Khalifa, Alicia García-Holgadob
article en

Abstract

This paper examines assessment indicators for evaluating learning outcomes in higher education and proposes a structured framework that categorizes them into seven key areas: Content Quality, Engagement Metrics, Study Time, Assessment Indicators, Difficulty and Efficiency, Participation Metrics, and Motivation and Tracking Indicators. This framework helps educators better understand student performance and engagement. Building on this, an ontological model is introduced to standardize and organize these indicators, enhancing interoperability and supporting automated reasoning for educational decision-making. It is compatible with Learning Management Systems and includes mechanisms for generating automated feedback for timely and personalized interventions. An empirical evaluation shows the model’s effectiveness in identifying at-risk students and providing tailored feedback. The paper concludes by discussing the framework’s implications for improving assessment practices and future directions involving advanced analytics and artificial intelligence in learning outcome assessments.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 270
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.