Dimensions of Perceived Humanness in Artificial Faces: Evaluating Anatomical and Affective Impressions in the Uncanny Valley

This study investigates how humans evaluate artificial faces in the context of the uncanny valley, with the aim of exploring perceptual factors that may inform user-centered design. Participants viewed a series of facial images, including a real person, an AI-generated image, and several 3D-modeled faces based on the real individual. The Semantic Differential (SD) method was used to assess affective impressions, and a free-response question elicited participants’ intuitive criteria. Factor analysis revealed three interpretable dimensions: “Interpersonal Attraction,” “Impression,” and “Humanness.” Principal Component Analysis (PCA) further suggested that “Humanness” involves two subcomponents: perceived anatomical correctness and affective warmth. Text mining of the open-ended responses identified references to emotional expressions and facial realism as common bases for judgment. While the study remains exploratory, the results suggest that anatomical consistency and emotional cues may influence perceived familiarity and comfort in artificial faces. These findings provide tentative implications for affective computing and character design by highlighting aspects of facial presentation that may reduce negative impressions associated with the uncanny valley. Such insights may contribute to the refinement of user experiences in virtual agents and human-robot interaction, particularly when designing anthropomorphic characters in a human-centered framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.09.643
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensions of Perceived Humanness in Artificial Faces: Evaluating Anatomical and Affective Impressions in the Uncanny Valley

Mayu Shintani, Fumiya Yonemitsu, Sumito NAGASAWA, Ryosei Ooki
Procedia Computer Science
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Dimensions of Perceived Humanness in Artificial Faces: Evaluating Anatomical and Affective Impressions in the Uncanny Valley

Mayu Shintani, Fumiya Yonemitsu, Sumito NAGASAWA, Ryosei Ooki
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how humans evaluate artificial faces in the context of the uncanny valley, with the aim of exploring perceptual factors that may inform user-centered design. Participants viewed a series of facial images, including a real person, an AI-generated image, and several 3D-modeled faces based on the real individual. The Semantic Differential (SD) method was used to assess affective impressions, and a free-response question elicited participants’ intuitive criteria. Factor analysis revealed three interpretable dimensions: “Interpersonal Attraction,” “Impression,” and “Humanness.” Principal Component Analysis (PCA) further suggested that “Humanness” involves two subcomponents: perceived anatomical correctness and affective warmth. Text mining of the open-ended responses identified references to emotional expressions and facial realism as common bases for judgment. While the study remains exploratory, the results suggest that anatomical consistency and emotional cues may influence perceived familiarity and comfort in artificial faces. These findings provide tentative implications for affective computing and character design by highlighting aspects of facial presentation that may reduce negative impressions associated with the uncanny valley. Such insights may contribute to the refinement of user experiences in virtual agents and human-robot interaction, particularly when designing anthropomorphic characters in a human-centered framework.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 270
Shibaura Institute of Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.