Advantages of scoping reviews in studies about technological implementations on medical interventions

Scoping reviews represent a powerful methodological tool for synthesizing knowledge across broad and interdisciplinary domains, particularly where technological advancements intersect with medical practice. Unlike traditional systematic reviews that rely on narrowly defined research questions and stringent inclusion criteria, scoping reviews allow for a wider scope of inquiry and the inclusion of diverse evidence types, including grey literature, technical reports, and early-stage research. This flexibility is particularly advantageous when assessing the impact of emerging technologies on medical protocols and interventions, where the pace of innovation often outstrips the availability of standardized clinical data. This paper explores the methodological advantages of scoping reviews in the context of investigating technological implementations in healthcare. As a practical illustration, we present a case study on the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the treatment of insomnia. We outline the process of developing a scoping review protocol tailored to this topic and discuss how it supports a comprehensive understanding of the field, enables identification of knowledge gaps, and informs future research directions. The findings underscore the value of scoping reviews in mapping complex, evolving research landscapes and in facilitating interdisciplinary insights that may be missed by more narrowly focused review methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.015
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advantages of scoping reviews in studies about technological implementations on medical interventions

Natividad Martínez Madrid, Juan Antonio Ortega, Ralf Seepold, Daniel Vélez Gutiérrez
Procedia Computer Science
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Advantages of scoping reviews in studies about technological implementations on medical interventions

Natividad Martínez Madrid, Juan Antonio Ortega, Ralf Seepold, Daniel Vélez Gutiérrez
article en

Abstract

Scoping reviews represent a powerful methodological tool for synthesizing knowledge across broad and interdisciplinary domains, particularly where technological advancements intersect with medical practice. Unlike traditional systematic reviews that rely on narrowly defined research questions and stringent inclusion criteria, scoping reviews allow for a wider scope of inquiry and the inclusion of diverse evidence types, including grey literature, technical reports, and early-stage research. This flexibility is particularly advantageous when assessing the impact of emerging technologies on medical protocols and interventions, where the pace of innovation often outstrips the availability of standardized clinical data. This paper explores the methodological advantages of scoping reviews in the context of investigating technological implementations in healthcare. As a practical illustration, we present a case study on the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the treatment of insomnia. We outline the process of developing a scoping review protocol tailored to this topic and discuss how it supports a comprehensive understanding of the field, enables identification of knowledge gaps, and informs future research directions. The findings underscore the value of scoping reviews in mapping complex, evolving research landscapes and in facilitating interdisciplinary insights that may be missed by more narrowly focused review methodologies.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 270
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (ES), Reutlingen University (DE), Universidad de Sevilla (ES), HTWG Hochschule Konstanz - Technik, Wirtschaft und Gestaltung (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.