Differentiated or deficient? Perspective on multidimensional maturity models – Evidence from a structured literature review

This paper explores the intricacies and challenges involved in developing and deploying digital maturity models within organizations undergoing digital transformation. Additionally, it investigates the transition from unidimensional to multidimensional digital maturity models, focusing on the difficulties arising from the lack of structured methodologies and precise definitions in existing models. Through a systematic literature review, this paper critically evaluates how multidimensional models can more accurately reflect the complexities inherent in organizational digital transformation. The results indicate that, although multidimensional models provide a more thorough assessment of organizational capabilities, ambiguities in their definitions and applications remain, highlighting the need for clearer differentiation and integration in their evaluation methods. The paper concludes by emphasizing the necessity for empirical research to improve the validity and robustness of maturity models, and it suggests future research directions to refine these tools for both practical and theoretical advancements in digital transformation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.09.135
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differentiated or deficient? Perspective on multidimensional maturity models – Evidence from a structured literature review

Patrick Ulrich, Alexander Sprengel
Procedia Computer Science
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Differentiated or deficient? Perspective on multidimensional maturity models – Evidence from a structured literature review

Patrick Ulrich, Alexander Sprengel
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the intricacies and challenges involved in developing and deploying digital maturity models within organizations undergoing digital transformation. Additionally, it investigates the transition from unidimensional to multidimensional digital maturity models, focusing on the difficulties arising from the lack of structured methodologies and precise definitions in existing models. Through a systematic literature review, this paper critically evaluates how multidimensional models can more accurately reflect the complexities inherent in organizational digital transformation. The results indicate that, although multidimensional models provide a more thorough assessment of organizational capabilities, ambiguities in their definitions and applications remain, highlighting the need for clearer differentiation and integration in their evaluation methods. The paper concludes by emphasizing the necessity for empirical research to improve the validity and robustness of maturity models, and it suggests future research directions to refine these tools for both practical and theoretical advancements in digital transformation strategies.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 270
Hochschule Aalen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differentiated or deficient? Perspective on multidimensional maturity models – Evidence from a structured literature review — Patrick Ulrich, Alexander Sprengel · Procedia Computer Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS