Examining the Influence of PSO Detection on Eye-Tracking During Reading

Post-saccadic oscillations (PSOs) are commonly observed in eye movement data but are often neglected, resulting in misclassifications of eye movement events and inaccurate interpretations. This study utilizes an event detection model based on CNN architecture that classifies eye movement data into three categories of events: fixations, saccades, and PSOs. The model is used to classify eye movement data collected during text reading. The results of the model are then compared with the commonly used classic SR Research software algorithm, which classifies eye movement data into fixations and saccades only. We compare the results and show that PSO detection significantly influences statistics for fixations (like average duration) that are commonly used to analyze different properties of the text being read (like complexity of the text). We postulate that PSOs should be taken into account in future eye movements when reading research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.09.545
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Influence of PSO Detection on Eye-Tracking During Reading

Mohd Faizan Ansari, Paweł Kasprowski, Birtukan Adamu Birawo
Procedia Computer Science
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Examining the Influence of PSO Detection on Eye-Tracking During Reading

Mohd Faizan Ansari, Paweł Kasprowski, Birtukan Adamu Birawo
article en

Abstract

Post-saccadic oscillations (PSOs) are commonly observed in eye movement data but are often neglected, resulting in misclassifications of eye movement events and inaccurate interpretations. This study utilizes an event detection model based on CNN architecture that classifies eye movement data into three categories of events: fixations, saccades, and PSOs. The model is used to classify eye movement data collected during text reading. The results of the model are then compared with the commonly used classic SR Research software algorithm, which classifies eye movement data into fixations and saccades only. We compare the results and show that PSO detection significantly influences statistics for fixations (like average duration) that are commonly used to analyze different properties of the text being read (like complexity of the text). We postulate that PSOs should be taken into account in future eye movements when reading research.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 270
Silesian University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.