Outpatient low-dose venetoclax-azacitidine vs intensive therapy in newly diagnosed AML in resource-limited settings

1. Outpatient low-dose VenAza plus itraconazole reduced early mortality and hospitalizations while maintaining treatment efficacy. 2. VenAza offers a safer, cost-effective alternative to intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment in fit adults traditionally relies on intensive chemotherapy, but access to supportive care and inpatient capacity limits its feasibility in low-resource settings. Venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, has shown promise in unfit AML patients, but its role in induction-eligible adults remains unclear. We retrospectively compared an outpatient regimen combining low-dose venetoclax, itraconazole, and azacitidine (VenAza) versus intensive chemotherapy in 100 adults with newly diagnosed AML. Forty-four received low-dose VenAza and 56 intensive therapy. The VenAza group had significantly fewer complications (54.5% vs. 98.1%, p=.0001), due to lower febrile neutropenia rates (50% vs. 90.6%, p=.0001). Half of the VenAza group remained ambulatory during induction (50% vs. 1.8%, p=.0001), had shorter hospital stays (median 14 vs. 28 days, p=.0001) and reduced 60-day mortality (4.5% vs. 26.8%, p=.003). Response rates were comparable (59.5% vs. 76.9%, p=.10), and relapse-free survival was significantly longer with VenAza (not reached vs. 6.2 months, p=.017). The incidence of relapse was also lower (p=.002). VenAza showed similar overall survival (10.1 vs. 9.0 months; p = .097). Landmark and Cox analyses confirmed these findings, with VenAza independently associated with improved OS (HR 1.82, p = .039) and RFS (HR 3.23, p = .043), and a trend for EFS (HR 1.72, p = .061). Outpatient VenAza reduced hospitalizations, early deaths, and complications, while maintaining efficacy. This strategy may represent a safer, cost-effective alternative to intensive chemotherapy for induction-eligible AML patients in low-resource settings, potentially informing global practice where supportive care is limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Global Hematology
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bglo.2025.100045
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outpatient low-dose venetoclax-azacitidine vs intensive therapy in newly diagnosed AML in resource-limited settings

Yadith Karina López‐García, David Gómez‐Almaguer, Guillermo J. Ruíz‐Argüelles, Andrés Gómez‐De León et al.
Blood Global Hematology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Outpatient low-dose venetoclax-azacitidine vs intensive therapy in newly diagnosed AML in resource-limited settings

Yadith Karina López‐García, David Gómez‐Almaguer, Guillermo J. Ruíz‐Argüelles, Andrés Gómez‐De León, Juan Carlos Olivares‐Gazca, Fernando De la Garza‐Salazar, Alexis De la Rosa-Flores, Paulo Ugarte-Peláez
article en

Abstract

1. Outpatient low-dose VenAza plus itraconazole reduced early mortality and hospitalizations while maintaining treatment efficacy. 2. VenAza offers a safer, cost-effective alternative to intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment in fit adults traditionally relies on intensive chemotherapy, but access to supportive care and inpatient capacity limits its feasibility in low-resource settings. Venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor, has shown promise in unfit AML patients, but its role in induction-eligible adults remains unclear. We retrospectively compared an outpatient regimen combining low-dose venetoclax, itraconazole, and azacitidine (VenAza) versus intensive chemotherapy in 100 adults with newly diagnosed AML. Forty-four received low-dose VenAza and 56 intensive therapy. The VenAza group had significantly fewer complications (54.5% vs. 98.1%, p=.0001), due to lower febrile neutropenia rates (50% vs. 90.6%, p=.0001). Half of the VenAza group remained ambulatory during induction (50% vs. 1.8%, p=.0001), had shorter hospital stays (median 14 vs. 28 days, p=.0001) and reduced 60-day mortality (4.5% vs. 26.8%, p=.003). Response rates were comparable (59.5% vs. 76.9%, p=.10), and relapse-free survival was significantly longer with VenAza (not reached vs. 6.2 months, p=.017). The incidence of relapse was also lower (p=.002). VenAza showed similar overall survival (10.1 vs. 9.0 months; p = .097). Landmark and Cox analyses confirmed these findings, with VenAza independently associated with improved OS (HR 1.82, p = .039) and RFS (HR 3.23, p = .043), and a trend for EFS (HR 1.72, p = .061). Outpatient VenAza reduced hospitalizations, early deaths, and complications, while maintaining efficacy. This strategy may represent a safer, cost-effective alternative to intensive chemotherapy for induction-eligible AML patients in low-resource settings, potentially informing global practice where supportive care is limited.

Blood Global HematologyVol. 2(1)
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (MX), Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez (MX), Clínica Ruiz (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.