Bertrand competition and captive customers

We study a Bertrand oligopoly with asymmetric costs in which each seller has some “captive” buyers. In the limit as captive buyers vanish, the lowest-cost firm sells to all buyers at a price equal to the second-lowest marginal cost. However, the closest competing price arises from non-degenerate mixed strategies, firms play exclusively undominated strategies, and with positive probability all but one firm sets the monopoly price. • A vanishing small set of captive buyers selects an equilibrium of classic Bertrand oligopoly. • The lowest-cost firm sells to all buyers at a price equal to the second-lowest marginal cost. • The closest competing price arises from non-degenerate mixed strategies. • Firms play exclusively undominated strategies. • With positive probability all but one firm sets the monopoly price.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112710
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bertrand competition and captive customers

David Ronayne, David P. Myatt
2 citations
Economics Letters
Merger and Competition Analysis
6.26
article

Bertrand competition and captive customers

David Ronayne, David P. Myatt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We study a Bertrand oligopoly with asymmetric costs in which each seller has some “captive” buyers. In the limit as captive buyers vanish, the lowest-cost firm sells to all buyers at a price equal to the second-lowest marginal cost. However, the closest competing price arises from non-degenerate mixed strategies, firms play exclusively undominated strategies, and with positive probability all but one firm sets the monopoly price. • A vanishing small set of captive buyers selects an equilibrium of classic Bertrand oligopoly. • The lowest-cost firm sells to all buyers at a price equal to the second-lowest marginal cost. • The closest competing price arises from non-degenerate mixed strategies. • Firms play exclusively undominated strategies. • With positive probability all but one firm sets the monopoly price.

Economics LettersVol. 257
London Business School (GB), European School of Management and Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Merger and Competition Analysis
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.